These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1540 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7581446)

  • 1. Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results.
    Lander E; Kruglyak L
    Nat Genet; 1995 Nov; 11(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 7581446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using family history information to distinguish true and false positive model-free linkage results.
    Olson JM; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 9554555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical testing of genetic linkage under heterogeneity.
    Shoukri MM; Lathrop GM
    Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):151-61. PubMed ID: 8513100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust LOD scores for variance component-based linkage analysis.
    Blangero J; Williams JT; Almasy L
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000; 19 Suppl 1():S8-14. PubMed ID: 11055364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical genomewide significance levels established by whole genome simulations.
    Sawcer S; Jones HB; Judge D; Visser F; Compston A; Goodfellow PN; Clayton D
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 9181352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic linkage and association studies in bipolar affective disorder: a time for optimism.
    Schulze TG; McMahon FJ
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2003 Nov; 123C(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 14601035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting local high-scoring segments: a first-stage approach for genome-wide association studies.
    Guedj M; Robelin D; Hoebeke M; Lamarine M; Wojcik J; Nuel G
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article22. PubMed ID: 17049033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model-free vs. model-based linkage analysis: a false dichotomy?
    Hodge SE
    Am J Med Genet; 2001 Jan; 105(1):62-4. PubMed ID: 11425002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of data quality on the identification of complex disease genes: experience from the Family Blood Pressure Program.
    Chang YP; Kim JD; Schwander K; Rao DC; Miller MB; Weder AB; Cooper RS; Schork NJ; Province MA; Morrison AC; Kardia SL; Quertermous T; Chakravarti A
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Apr; 14(4):469-77. PubMed ID: 16493446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multipoint oligogenic linkage analysis of quantitative traits.
    Blangero J; Almasy L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):959-64. PubMed ID: 9433607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation between quantitative traits and correlation between corresponding LOD scores: detection of pleiotropic effects.
    Ulgen A; Han Z; Li W
    BMC Genet; 2003 Dec; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S60. PubMed ID: 14975128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of the regressive models in linkage analysis of quantitative traits.
    Demenais F; Lathrop M
    Genet Epidemiol; 1993; 10(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 8314065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ordered subset analysis in genetic linkage mapping of complex traits.
    Hauser ER; Watanabe RM; Duren WL; Bass MP; Langefeld CD; Boehnke M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 27(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 15185403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship uncertainty linkage statistics (RULS): affected relative pair statistics that model relationship uncertainty.
    Ray A; Weeks DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 May; 32(4):313-24. PubMed ID: 18205206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Segregation and linkage analysis of the complex trait Q1.
    Atwood LD; Mitchell BD; Stowell NC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):713-8. PubMed ID: 8787997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Model-based linkage analysis with imprinting for quantitative traits: ignoring imprinting effects can severely jeopardize detection of linkage.
    Sung YJ; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jul; 32(5):487-96. PubMed ID: 18366130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power and robustness of a score test for linkage analysis of quantitative traits using identity by descent data on sib pairs.
    Goldstein DR; Dudoit S; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 May; 20(4):415-31. PubMed ID: 11319783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood-based methods.
    Slager SL; Huang J; Vieland VJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):192-209. PubMed ID: 11180446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distribution and magnitude of type I error of model-based multipoint lod scores: implications for multipoint mod scores.
    Xing C; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 30(5):447-58. PubMed ID: 16685712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Score test for detecting linkage to complex traits in selected samples.
    Lebrec J; Putter H; Houwelingen JC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 27(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 15305326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 77.