145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7583433)
21. [New ways].
Balzer K
Pflege Z; 2008 Jan; 61(1):1. PubMed ID: 18251185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A review of the second decade of the Annual Review of Nursing Research series.
Fitzpatrick JJ; Stevenson JS
Annu Rev Nurs Res; 2003; 21():335-60. PubMed ID: 12858702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Do journals have a publication bias?
Pickar JH
Maturitas; 2007 May; 57(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 17376614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ethical and quasi-ethical issues in medical editing and publishing.
Pitkin RM
Croat Med J; 1998 Jun; 39(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 9575262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Publishing your findings.
King KM; Price PM
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2003; 13(2):46-8. PubMed ID: 12802838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Reporting of approval by research ethics committee and informed consent should be included in scientific information. A neglected quality indicator].
Lafolie P
Lakartidningen; 2002 Dec; 99(51-52):5180-1. PubMed ID: 12572314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. In Appreciation of the Maternal and Child Health Journal's Peer Reviewers, 2017.
Matern Child Health J; 2018 Jan; 22(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 29302862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. What is your opinion on the "medical ethics of medical journal editors"?
Phaosavasdi S; Taneepanichskul S; Tannirandorn Y; Thamkhantho M; Prugsapong C; Phupong V; Karnjanapitak A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Aug; 88(8):1163-4. PubMed ID: 16404851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Medical Hypotheses 2006 impact factor rises to 1.3--a vindication of the 'editorial review' system for revolutionary science.
Charlton BG
Med Hypotheses; 2007; 69(5):967-9. PubMed ID: 17706892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Review process for nursing journals: making the best of any review system.
Swanson EA
Nurse Author Ed; 1993; 3(2):3-4, 7-9. PubMed ID: 8220617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Blind peer review: tips for authors, reviewers, and editors.
Flanagin A
Nurse Author Ed; 1994; 4(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 7849791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Editorial peer review: is nursing at risk?
Fondiller SH
Nurs Health Care; 1994 Mar; 15(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 8152639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Peer review: a closed system in need of reform].
Thörn A
Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3106-8. PubMed ID: 12198928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dissemination of medical information: a journal's role.
Kassirer JP
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Dec; 703():173-9. PubMed ID: 8192294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Differences in the quality of Spanish clinical trials published in international periodicals and of the ones presented in general medicine periodicals with wide readership].
Delgado Rodríguez M; Ruiz-Canela M; de Irala-Estévez J; Llorca Díaz J; Martínez-González MA
Rev Clin Esp; 2001 Aug; 201(8):437-43. PubMed ID: 11599154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Don't send it yet! Getting your manuscript ready to submit.
Robinson R; Rivers DL
Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 14562511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Peer review and the nursing literature.
Dougherty MC
Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Prepublication review of medical ethics research: cause for concern.
Landy DC; Coverdale JH; McCullough LB; Sharp RR
Acad Med; 2009 Apr; 84(4):495-7. PubMed ID: 19318788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ratings and rankings: judging the evaluation of quality.
Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2005; 53(5):215-6. PubMed ID: 16226562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Reviewing manuscripts: developing an efficient system.
Brooks-Brunn JA
Nurse Author Ed; 1993; 3(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 8220621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
