These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7583724)

  • 1. Comparison of helical and conventional computed tomography of the liver.
    Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Reinhold C; Atri M
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1995 Dec; 46(6):443-8. PubMed ID: 7583724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing liver contrast in helical liver CT: value of a real-time bolus-triggering technique.
    Dinkel HP; Fieger M; Knüpffer J; Moll R; Schindler G
    Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(9):1608-12. PubMed ID: 9866771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of two injection protocols using helical and dynamic acquisitions in CT examinations of the pancreas.
    Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Atri M; Garcia P; Reinhold C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 8659419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Nelson RC; Chezmar JL; Peterson JE; Bernardino ME
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):973-6. PubMed ID: 2801447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hepatic enhancement during helical CT: a comparison of moderate rate uniphasic and biphasic contrast injection protocols.
    Birnbaum BA; Jacobs JE; Yin D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 7676980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
    Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Helical CT of the liver: evaluation of injection flow rate, mode, and scan delay with a reduced-volume contrast medium bolus.
    Kopka L; Funke M; Vosshenrich R; Hagemann A; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(3):406-11. PubMed ID: 7790550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hepatic helical CT: contrast material injection protocol.
    Foley WD; Hoffmann RG; Quiroz FA; Kahn CE; Perret RS
    Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):367-71. PubMed ID: 8029399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of rate of contrast medium injection on hepatic enhancement at CT.
    Garcia PA; Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Liang L; Reinhold C; Atri M
    Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 8633144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing contrast enhancement during helical CT of the liver: a comparison of two bolus tracking techniques.
    Schweiger GD; Chang PJ; Brown BP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Dec; 171(6):1551-8. PubMed ID: 9843287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
    Tublin ME; Tessler FN; Cheng SL; Peters TL; McGovern PC
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast material for combined abdominal and pelvic CT: can cost be reduced by increasing the concentration and decreasing the volume?
    Baker ME; Beam C; Leder R; Gulliver D; Paine SS; Dunnick NR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):637-41. PubMed ID: 8430570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Helical CT of the liver: value of an early hepatic arterial phase.
    Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Reinhold C; Atri M
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):357-63. PubMed ID: 7480677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography.
    Sahani DV; Soulez G; Chen KM; Lepanto L; Xu JR; Nelson RC; Grazioli L; Vanzulli A; Heiken JP;
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):856-61. PubMed ID: 18007158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The optimal temporal window for CT of the liver using a time-density analysis: implications for helical (spiral) CT.
    Silverman PM; Cooper C; Trock B; Garra BS; Davros WJ; Zeman RK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 7822552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple-phase helical CT of the liver for detecting small hepatomas in patients with liver cirrhosis: contrast-injection protocol and optimal timing.
    Mitsuzaki K; Yamashita Y; Ogata I; Nishiharu T; Urata J; Takahashi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 8751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hepatic dynamic sequential CT: section enhancement profiles with a bolus of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Nelson RC; Moyers JH; Chezmar JL; Hoel MJ; Jones EC; Peterson JE; Cork RD; Bernardino ME
    Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):499-502. PubMed ID: 1987614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved pelvicalyceal visualization with multidetector computed tomography urography; comparison with helical computed tomography.
    Raptopoulos V; McNamara A
    Eur Radiol; 2005 Sep; 15(9):1834-40. PubMed ID: 15761715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An optimal contrast dose indicator for the determination of hepatic enhancement in abdominal multidetector computed tomography: comparison of patient attenuation indicator with total body weight and body mass index.
    Li J; Udayasankar UK; Tang X; Carew J; Toth TL; Small WC
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(6):874-8. PubMed ID: 21084903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of portal venous flow augmentation on liver enhancement with CT.
    Garcia P; Bonaldi V; Bret PM; Liang L; Atri M; Reinhold C
    Abdom Imaging; 1997; 22(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 9107650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.