These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7583866)

  • 1. Comparison of three methods of using the DermaPIK with the standard prick method for epicutaneous skin testing.
    Corder WT; Wilson NW
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1995 Nov; 75(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 7583866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of two disposable plastic skin test devices with the bifurcated needle for epicutaneous allergy testing.
    Corder WT; Hogan MB; Wilson NW
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1996 Sep; 77(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 8814048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of devices for skin prick testing.
    Nelson HS; Lahr J; Buchmeier A; McCormick D
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1998 Feb; 101(2 Pt 1):153-6. PubMed ID: 9500746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective evaluation of skin prick test reactions using digital photography.
    dos Santos RV; Titus RG; Lima HC
    Skin Res Technol; 2007 May; 13(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 17374055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The comparison of reactions in skin prick test performed with the standardized lancet and the injection needle].
    Semik-Orzech A; Barczyk A; Pierzchała W
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jun; 24(144):495-501. PubMed ID: 18702329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of different diagnostic products for skin prick testing.
    Pagani M; Antico A; Cilia M; Calabrò D; Poto S; Pecora S; Burastero SE
    Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2009 Feb; 41(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19496349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of three methods for using the Duotip-Test device for skin testing.
    Sangsupawanich P; Chamnanphol S; Koonrungsrisomboon D
    Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2000 Sep; 18(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11270470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skin prick test responses to codeine, histamine, and ragweed utilizing the Multitest device.
    Lin RY; Erlich ER; Don PC
    Ann Allergy; 1990 Sep; 65(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 2403228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical evaluation of the use of skin tests and cellular tests in standardization of allergens.
    de Weck AL; Derer T
    Arb Paul Ehrlich Inst Bundesamt Sera Impfstoffe Frankf A M; 1994; (87):89-114; discussion 114-7. PubMed ID: 7873071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Skin reactivity in the histamine-equivalent skin test in hypersensitivity to grass pollen].
    Paranos S; Petrović S; Bojović I
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2000; 128(5-6):194-9. PubMed ID: 11089421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laser skin testing.
    Kardassakis DG; Grekin RC; LeBoit PE
    Ann Allergy; 1992 Mar; 68(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 1546824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of skin prick test reactions with a scanning program.
    Pijnenborg H; Nilsson L; Dreborg S
    Allergy; 1996 Nov; 51(11):782-8. PubMed ID: 8947335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The use of laser Doppler flowmetry for assessment of skin prick tests with histamine solutions and allergens].
    Zakrzewski A; Kruszewski J; Kłos K; Lademann A
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2005 Mar; 18(105):282-6. PubMed ID: 15997633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative performance of five commercial prick skin test devices.
    Nelson HS; Rosloniec DM; McCall LI; Iklé D
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1993 Nov; 92(5):750-6. PubMed ID: 8227867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Usefulness of skin prick test using bifurcated needle for the diagnosis of food allergy in infantile atopic dermatitis--1st report. Case of egg allergy].
    Ogata M; Sukuya A; Sugizaki C; Ikematsu K; Imai T; Tachimoto H; Ebisawa M
    Arerugi; 2008 Jul; 57(7):843-52. PubMed ID: 18688185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Use of thermographic methods for estimation of skin prick test results. II. Evaluation of skin prick test results with histamine solutions of different concentration using liquid crystal mixtures].
    Zuber J; Kruszewski J; Zmija J; Kłosowicz S; Jung A
    Pneumonol Alergol Pol; 1996; 64(3-4):123-31. PubMed ID: 8754955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Multi-Test II and Skintestor Omni allergy skin test devices.
    Dykewicz MS; Lemmon JK; Keaney DL
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2007 Jun; 98(6):559-62. PubMed ID: 17601269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of six epicutaneous devices in the performance of immediate hypersensitivity skin testing.
    Adinoff AD; Rosloniec DM; McCall LL; Nelson HS
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1989 Aug; 84(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 2760359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of atopic status and potential risk factors for sensitization on histamine skin reactivity in unselected Belgian children.
    Van Gysel D; Govaere E; Verhamme K; Doli E; De Baets F
    Pediatr Dermatol; 2007; 24(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 17845156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Onset and duration of action of topical antihistamine: a study of histamine skin test response.
    Danarti R; Waskito F; Indrastuti N
    Int J Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 47(8):861-3. PubMed ID: 18717873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.