These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7584348)

  • 1. The induction of rules for predicting chemical carcinogenesis in rodents.
    Bahler D; Bristol DW
    Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol; 1993; 1():29-37. PubMed ID: 7584348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays from molecular structure using inductive logic programming.
    King RD; Srinivasan A
    Environ Health Perspect; 1996 Oct; 104 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):1031-40. PubMed ID: 8933051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of the carcinogenicity in rodents of chemicals currently being tested by the US National Toxicology Program: structure-activity correlations.
    Rosenkranz HS; Klopman G
    Mutagenesis; 1990 Sep; 5(5):425-32. PubMed ID: 2263200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting chemical carcinogenesis in rodents: the state of the art in light of a comparative exercise.
    Benigni R
    Mutat Res; 1995 Feb; 334(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 7528333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chemical structure of mutagens and carcinogens and the relationship with biological activity.
    Benigni R
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2004 Mar; 23(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 15149144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristic substructures and properties in chemical carcinogens studied by the cascade model.
    Okada T
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(10):1208-15. PubMed ID: 12835263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of the outcome of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays currently being conducted on 44 chemicals by the National Toxicology Program.
    Tennant RW; Spalding J; Stasiewicz S; Ashby J
    Mutagenesis; 1990 Jan; 5(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 2184307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. QSARS of mutagens and carcinogens: two case studies illustrating problems in the construction of models for noncongeneric chemicals.
    Benigni R; Richard AM
    Mutat Res; 1996 Nov; 371(1-2):29-46. PubMed ID: 8950348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of rodent carcinogens by an expert system.
    Rosenkranz HS; Klopman G
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340B():23-48. PubMed ID: 2203007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alternatives to the carcinogenicity bioassay for toxicity prediction: are we there yet?
    Benigni R
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2012 Apr; 8(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 22360376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning rules to predict rodent carcinogenicity of non-genotoxic chemicals.
    Lee Y; Buchanan BG; Mattison DM; Klopman G; Rosenkranz HS
    Mutat Res; 1995 May; 328(2):127-49. PubMed ID: 7739598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The second National Toxicology Program comparative exercise on the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity: definitive results.
    Benigni R; Zito R
    Mutat Res; 2004 Jan; 566(1):49-63. PubMed ID: 14706511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structure-based methods for predicting mutagenicity and carcinogenicity: are we there yet?
    Richard AM
    Mutat Res; 1998 May; 400(1-2):493-507. PubMed ID: 9685707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided rodent carcinogenicity prediction.
    Lagunin AA; Dearden JC; Filimonov DA; Poroikov VV
    Mutat Res; 2005 Oct; 586(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 16112600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of criteria used to access carcinogenicity in CPANN QSAR models versus the knowledge-based expert system Toxtree.
    Fjodorova N; Novič M
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2014; 25(6):423-41. PubMed ID: 24716754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterizing and predicting carcinogenicity and mode of action using conventional and toxicogenomics methods.
    Waters MD; Jackson M; Lea I
    Mutat Res; 2010 Dec; 705(3):184-200. PubMed ID: 20399889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epidemiological and experimental applications to occupational cancer prevention.
    Vainio H; Hemminki K
    J UOEH; 1989 Mar; 11 Suppl():323-45. PubMed ID: 2664947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A survey of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001.
    Helma C; Kramer S
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(10):1179-82. PubMed ID: 12835259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genotoxicity of 1,3-butadiene and its epoxy intermediates.
    Walker VE; Walker DM; Meng Q; McDonald JD; Scott BR; Seilkop SK; Claffey DJ; Upton PB; Powley MW; Swenberg JA; Henderson RF;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Aug; (144):3-79. PubMed ID: 20017413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.