137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7585729)
1. IgD myeloma: clinical characteristics and a new staging system based on analysis of Japanese patients.
Shimamoto Y
Cancer Detect Prev; 1995; 19(5):426-35. PubMed ID: 7585729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic factors and staging systems of multiple myeloma:
Tao ZF; Fu WJ; Yuan ZG; Wang DX; Chen YB; Hou J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Oct; 120(19):1655-8. PubMed ID: 17935664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. International prognostic index (IPI)--a critical comparison with five multiple myeloma staging systems in the group of 270 patients treated by conventional chemotherapy.
Scudla V; Zemanova M; Minarik J; Bacovsky J; Ordeltova M; Indrak K; Budikova M; Dusek L; Farbiakova V
Neoplasma; 2006; 53(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 16830053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Prognostic analysis and assessment on the clinical staging systems of multiple myeloma--a report of 206 cases].
Tao ZF; Fu WJ; Chen YB; Yuan ZG; Wang DX; Hou J
Ai Zheng; 2006 Apr; 25(4):461-4. PubMed ID: 16613681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. International staging system for multiple myeloma.
Greipp PR; San Miguel J; Durie BG; Crowley JJ; Barlogie B; Bladé J; Boccadoro M; Child JA; Avet-Loiseau H; Kyle RA; Lahuerta JJ; Ludwig H; Morgan G; Powles R; Shimizu K; Shustik C; Sonneveld P; Tosi P; Turesson I; Westin J
J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 23(15):3412-20. PubMed ID: 15809451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Prognostic value of the new international staging system in multiple myeloma. Comparison with Durie-Salmon staging system].
Conté L G; Figueroa M G; Lois V V; Cabrera C ME; León R A; García L H; Rojas R H
Rev Med Chil; 2008 Jan; 136(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18483648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Staging multiple myeloma patients with active disease using serum levels of beta2m-free HLA class I heavy chain together with IgM or platelet count.
Perosa F; Minoia C; Favoino E; Prete M; Dammacco F
Blood Cells Mol Dis; 2009; 42(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 18996035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging as a supplement for the clinical staging system of Durie and Salmon?
Baur A; Stäbler A; Nagel D; Lamerz R; Bartl R; Hiller E; Wendtner C; Bachner F; Reiser M
Cancer; 2002 Sep; 95(6):1334-45. PubMed ID: 12216103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Prognostic evaluation in multiple myeloma. Relationship between immunological types, single prognostic factors, clinical staging systems, morphological classification systems and survival].
Pasqualetti P; Colantonio D; Casale R; Di Lauro G; Collacciani A; Festuccia V; Trotta A; Natali G
Ann Ital Med Int; 1990; 5(3 Pt 1):195-204. PubMed ID: 2288822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA-image cytometry and clinical staging systems in multiple myeloma.
Kropff M; Leo E; Steinfurth G; Esselborn H; Adler CP; Böcking A
Anticancer Res; 1994; 14(5B):2183-8. PubMed ID: 7840520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immunoglobulin D myeloma--problems with diagnosing and staging (own experience and literature review).
Kuliszkiewicz-Janus M; Zimny A; Sokolska V; Saşiadek M; Kuliczkowski K
Leuk Lymphoma; 2005 Jul; 46(7):1029-37. PubMed ID: 16019554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Prognostic factors of multiple myeloma].
Paule B
Ann Med Interne (Paris); 1997; 148(8):534-41. PubMed ID: 9538400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of two staging systems for myeloma.
Vercelli D; Cozzolino F; Di Guglielmo R
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1981; 23(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 7290984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 in gastric carcinoma.
Reiter W; Stieber P; Reuter C; Nagel D; Cramer C; Pahl H; Fateh-Moghadam A
Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(4B):2903-6. PubMed ID: 9329559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic value of CEA and CA 19-9 serum levels in colorectal cancer.
Reiter W; Stieber P; Reuter C; Nagel D; Lau-Werner U; Lamerz R
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(6D):5195-8. PubMed ID: 11326694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma: selection using Cox's proportional hazard model.
Pasqualetti P; Collacciani A; Maccarone C; Casale R
Biomed Pharmacother; 1996; 50(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 8672729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 in multiple myeloma: association with reduced survival.
Cetin M; Buyukberber S; Demir M; Sari I; Sari I; Deniz K; Eser B; Altuntas F; Camci C; Oztürk A; Turgut B; Vural O; Unal A
Am J Hematol; 2005 Nov; 80(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16247750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simple prognostic model for patients with multiple myeloma: a single-center study in Japan.
Kaneko M; Kanda Y; Oshima K; Nannya Y; Suguro M; Yamamoto R; Chizuka A; Hamaki T; Matsuyama T; Takezako N; Miwa A; Togawa A
Ann Hematol; 2002 Jan; 81(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 11807633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New staging systems can predict prognosis of multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation as first-line therapy.
Kim H; Sohn HJ; Kim S; Kim K; Lee JH; Bang SM; Kim DH; Sohn SK; Lee JJ; Suh C
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2006 Aug; 12(8):837-44. PubMed ID: 16864054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple myeloma in the region of Bursa, Turkey: a retrospective analysis.
Ozkalemkaş F; Ali R; Tunali A; Ozkocaman V; Ozyardimci C; Ozçelik T
J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 1996; 15(2-4):267-70. PubMed ID: 9216819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
