These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7585763)
21. [Doppler echocardiographic determination of the effective orifice area of mechanical heart valve prostheses in a flow model]. Fehske W; Köhler J; Rabahieh R; Braun P; Hostert A; Lüderitz B Z Kardiol; 1991 Jul; 80(7):441-8. PubMed ID: 1926989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Hemodynamic and hemolytic features of the St. Jude Medical valve prostheses. Sezai Y; Umeda S; Okazaki T; Okamoto I; Rikukawa H; Shiono M J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1984; 25(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 6707068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vitro assessment of prosthesis type and pressure recovery characteristics: Doppler echocardiography overestimation of bileaflet mechanical and bioprosthetic aortic valve gradients. Bach DS; Schmitz C; Dohmen G; Aaronson KD; Steinseifer U; Kleine P J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Aug; 144(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 22264413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In vitro velocity and turbulence measurements in the vicinity of three new mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses: Björk-Shiley Monostrut, Omni-Carbon, and Duromedics. Yoganathan AP; Sung HW; Woo YR; Jones M J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 May; 95(5):929-39. PubMed ID: 3361941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Doppler sonographic evaluation of the Duromedics-Edwards bileaflet valve at five-year follow up. Globits S; Rödler S; Moritz A; Schreiner W; Pacher R; Glogar D; Wolner E J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Nov; 2(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 7719508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs. Kleine P; Scherer M; Abdel-Rahman U; Klesius AA; Ackermann H; Moritz A J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Nov; 124(5):925-32. PubMed ID: 12407375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Rest and exercise evaluation of St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall prostheses. Influence of primary lesion, valvular type, valvular size, and left ventricular function. Tatineni S; Barner HB; Pearson AC; Halbe D; Woodruff R; Labovitz AJ Circulation; 1989 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):I16-23. PubMed ID: 2766522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Carbomedics and St. Jude Medical bileaflet valves: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Johnston RT; Weerasena NA; Butterfield M; Fisher J; Spyt TJ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6(5):267-71. PubMed ID: 1610596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve in the aortic position using the continuity equation. Chafizadeh ER; Zoghbi WA Circulation; 1991 Jan; 83(1):213-23. PubMed ID: 1984881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Hemodynamic performances of small diameter carbomedics and St. Jude valves. De Paulis R; Sommariva L; De Matteis GM; Polisca P; Tomai F; Bassano C; Penta de Peppo A; Chiariello L J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov; 5 Suppl 3():S339-43. PubMed ID: 8953465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Rest and exercise hemodynamics of 20 to 23 mm allograft, Medtronic Intact (porcine), and St. Jude Medical valves in the aortic position. Jaffe WM; Coverdale HA; Roche AH; Whitlock RM; Neutze JM; Barratt-Boyes BG J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Aug; 100(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 2385114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improved Doppler assessment of the Bjork-Shiley mitral prosthesis using the continuity equation. Mohan JC; Agrawal R; Arora R; Khalilullah M Int J Cardiol; 1994 Mar; 43(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 8181890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Coronary perfusion: impact of flow dynamics and geometric design of 2 different aortic prostheses of similar size. Mannacio V; Di Tommaso L; De Amicis V; Stassano P; Vosa C J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1030-5. PubMed ID: 21752400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Non-invasive determination of pressure gradients of heart valve prostheses using Doppler ultrasound]. Hoffmann A; Amann FW; Grädel E; Burckhardt D Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1982 Nov; 112(45):1600-3. PubMed ID: 7156956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of St. Jude Medical valves in the tricuspid position. Aoyagi S; Nishi Y; Kawara T; Oryoji A; Kosuga K; Ohishi K J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 May; 2(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 8269120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Hemodynamics of St. Jude Medical prostheses in the small aortic root: in vivo studies using dobutamine Doppler echocardiography. Kadir I; Izzat MB; Birdi I; Wilde P; Reeves B; Bryan AJ; Angelini GD J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Mar; 6(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 9130118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Doppler echocardiographic study of three different mechanical valves in the aortic position: the use of external nominal diameter indexed to body surface area. Bailly P; Camilleri L; Legault B; Fleury JP; D'Agrosa EM; de Riberolles C J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 May; 6(3):236-48. PubMed ID: 9183721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Contribution of Doppler echocardiography in the evaluation of normal and pathologic aortic valve prosthesis]. Habib G; Bénichou M; Gisbert MP; Bonnet JL; Scemama J; Djiane P; Bory M; Serradigmigni A Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1990 Jun; 83(7):937-45. PubMed ID: 2114853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical experience and Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the first one hundred ATS AP (advanced performance) prosthetic valve in the aortic position. Jazayeri S; Gomez MC; Tatou E; Ecarnot A; Saleh M; Bouchot O; Renaud C; Brenot R; David M J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Sep; 12(5):628-34; discussion 634. PubMed ID: 14565717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Comparative study of mechanical heart valves for implantation in mitral position]. Heiliger R; Lambertz H; Geks J; Mittermayer C Herz; 1987 Dec; 12(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 3428845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]