These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 758621)

  • 1. Effects of level of socialization on electrodermal detection of deception.
    Waid WM; Orne MT; Wilson SK
    Psychophysiology; 1979 Jan; 16(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 758621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Socialization, awareness, and the electrodermal response to deception and self-disclosure.
    Waid WM; Orne MT; Wilson SK
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1979 Dec; 88(6):663-6. PubMed ID: 512193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in electrodermal lability and the detection of information and deception.
    Waid WM; Orne MT
    J Appl Psychol; 1980 Feb; 65(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 7364702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-modal physiological effects of electrodermal lability in the detection of deception.
    Waid WM; Wilson SK; Orne MT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1981 Jun; 40(6):1118-25. PubMed ID: 7264879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy demonstrations, threat, and the detection of deception: cardiovascular, electrodermal, and pupillary measures.
    Bradley MT; Janisse MP
    Psychophysiology; 1981 May; 18(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 7291448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can simultaneously acquired electrodermal activity improve accuracy of fMRI detection of deception?
    Kozel FA; Johnson KA; Laken SJ; Grenesko EL; Smith JA; Walker J; George MS
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 18633826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temperature effects on polygraph detection of concealed information.
    MacNeill AL; Bradley MT
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 26435532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of attention, as indexed by subsequent memory, on electrodermal detection of information.
    Waid WM; Orne EC; Cook MR; Orne MT
    J Appl Psychol; 1978 Dec; 63(6):728-33. PubMed ID: 730635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Group GSR technique in the detection of deception.
    Orne MT; Thackray RI
    Percept Mot Skills; 1967 Dec; 25(3):809-16. PubMed ID: 6083301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of deception as a function of galvanic skin response recording methodology.
    Moroney WF; Zenhausern RJ
    J Psychol; 1972 Mar; 80(2d Half):255-62. PubMed ID: 5059820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of visual feedback and application of skin potential response to detection of deception].
    Suzuki S; Watanabe T; Shimizu K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1969 Jun; 40(2):59-67. PubMed ID: 5818018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meprobamate reduces accuracy of physiological detection of deception.
    Waid WM; Orne EC; Cook MR; Orne MT
    Science; 1981 Apr; 212(4490):71-3. PubMed ID: 7209522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of biofeedback on the detection of deception.
    Timm HW
    J Forensic Sci; 1987 May; 32(3):736-46. PubMed ID: 3598524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrodermal differentiation of deception: the effect of choice versus no choice of deceptive items.
    Furedy JJ; Gigliotti F; Ben-Shakhar G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 Oct; 18(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 7876035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Truth and deception: a reply to Lykken.
    Raskin DC; Podlesny JA
    Psychol Bull; 1979 Jan; 86(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 377355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of verbal responses on the laboratory detection of deception.
    Gustafson LA; Orne MT
    Psychophysiology; 1965 Jul; 2(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 5830488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An experimental comparison of the psychological stress evaluator and the galvanic skin response in detection of deception.
    Horvath F
    J Appl Psychol; 1978 Jun; 63(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 690061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of the type of stimulus employed and the level of subject awareness on the detection of deception.
    Thackray RI; Orne MT
    J Appl Psychol; 1968 Jun; 52(3):234-239. PubMed ID: 5659510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of diazepam and methylphenidate on the electrodermal detection of guilty knowledge.
    Iacono WG; Boisvenu GA; Fleming JA
    J Appl Psychol; 1984 May; 69(2):289-99. PubMed ID: 6735969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The objective use of multiple physiological indices in the detection of deception.
    Cutrow RJ; Parks A; Lucas N; Thomas K
    Psychophysiology; 1972 Nov; 9(6):578-88. PubMed ID: 5076025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.