These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 758636)

  • 1. Autoradiographic enhancement of mammograms. Investigation of a new dose reduction technique.
    Askins BS; Brill AB; Rao GU; Novak GR
    Radiology; 1979 Jan; 130(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 758636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recent experience in mammography using Trimax rare-earth system.
    Bruwer A
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1976 Dec; 27(4):283-5. PubMed ID: 186459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potential of dose reduction after marker placement with full-field digital mammography.
    Riedl CC; Jaromi S; Floery D; Pfarl G; Fuchsjaeger MH; Helbich TH
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jun; 40(6):343-8. PubMed ID: 15905720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Autoradiographic image intensification: applications in medical radiography.
    Askins BS
    Science; 1978 Feb; 199(4329):684-6. PubMed ID: 625659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Image quality and radiation exposure in mass mammography examinations: a report from the Survey Group for Institutional Evaluation].
    Suzuki R; Horita K; Asahara M; Koyama S; Sanada S; Terada H; Nishitani M; Ishikawa M; Wakamaru A; Kurowarabi K; Negishi T;
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 May; 59(5):604-16. PubMed ID: 12881688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Practical experiences with grid mammography in everyday practice].
    Lendvai-Virágh K; Lendvai T; Rückner R
    Rontgenblatter; 1983 Sep; 36(9):289-93. PubMed ID: 6635487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3-D mammograms: are they worth it?
    Johns Hopkins Med Lett Health After 50; 2014 Oct; 26(10):4. PubMed ID: 25306567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Possibilities of decreasing the risk associated with the irradiation in mammography].
    Zal'tsman IN; Novikova LV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1981; (4):75-9. PubMed ID: 7292971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Photon-counting digital mammography: evaluation of performance under clinically relevant conditions.
    Karellas A
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):913-5. PubMed ID: 22770464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnification film mammography: image quality and clinical studies.
    Sickles EA; Doi K; Genant HK
    Radiology; 1977 Oct; 125(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 897191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward Clinically Compatible Phase-Contrast Mammography.
    Scherer K; Willer K; Gromann L; Birnbacher L; Braig E; Grandl S; Sztrókay-Gaul A; Herzen J; Mayr D; Hellerhoff K; Pfeiffer F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130776. PubMed ID: 26110618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital mammography].
    Otsuka K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jun; 59(6):694-6. PubMed ID: 12881672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital breast techniques excel at image display.
    Yaffe MJ
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1993 May; 15(5):79-85, 105. PubMed ID: 10148580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved image quality for dense breasts in mammography.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Jan; 65(769):50-5. PubMed ID: 1486368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms.
    Tischenko O; Hoeschen C; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Maidment AD; Bakic PR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):81-4. PubMed ID: 15933085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital mammography better for some women. New technology helps see through breast tissue that can hide cancers.
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2005 Nov; 13(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 16408349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast enhanced mammography: techniques, current results, and potential indications.
    Lobbes MB; Smidt ML; Houwers J; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Wildberger JE
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Sep; 68(9):935-44. PubMed ID: 23790689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic patient dose registry and clinical audit on line for mammography.
    Ten JI; Vano E; Sánchez R; Fernandez-Soto JM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):346-9. PubMed ID: 25809108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.