These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Digital Imaging of the Breast: Is a Synthetic View Better? Jenks S J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Apr; 108(4):. PubMed ID: 27038116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Optimization of image quality and dose]. Omae N Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1478-85. PubMed ID: 22104243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Method of obtaining high-quality mammograms with a simultaneous decrease in the radiation load]. Varshavskiĭ IuV; Ostrovskaia IM; Lipkovich VS; Strel'tsov IS Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1980; (3):58-61. PubMed ID: 7395037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Digital mammography leads to more short-term follow-up. McDonough M; Wilhelm A; DePeri E AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):W121. PubMed ID: 20028885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Qualitative JPEG 2000 compression in digital mammography - evaluation using 480 mammograms of the CDMAM phantom. Schreiter NF; Steffen IG; Miller J; Fallenberg E; Poellinger A; Bick U; Diekmann F Rofo; 2011 Jul; 183(7):650-7. PubMed ID: 21667423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [History of articles in medical radiation dosimetry and protection--looking back the transition from analog radiography to digital radiography]. Mizutani H Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Dec; 70(12):1487-95. PubMed ID: 25672454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria. Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [New development in mammographic technique: Grid mammography (author's transl)]. Friedrich M Rofo; 1978 Feb; 128(2):207-22. PubMed ID: 147219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Enhancement of tissue structure visualization in breast specimen radiography. Eastgate RJ; Gilchrist KW; Matallana RH Radiology; 1979 Sep; 132(3):744-6. PubMed ID: 224414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Current x-ray diagnostic problems in breast cancer (a review)]. Rozhkova NI Med Radiol (Mosk); 1981 Nov; 26(11):68-73. PubMed ID: 7033712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector]. Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Letter: Image quality and radiation in mammography. Evans AL; James WB; McLellan J; Davison M Br J Radiol; 1975 Dec; 48(576):1035-6. PubMed ID: 1218344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]