224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7587243)
1. Standards of evidence for the safety and effectiveness of critical care monitoring devices and related interventions. Coalition for Critical Care Excellence: Consensus Conference on Physiologic Monitoring Devices.
Crit Care Med; 1995 Oct; 23(10):1756-63. PubMed ID: 7587243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physiologic monitoring devices.
Alpert S
Crit Care Med; 1995 Oct; 23(10):1626-7. PubMed ID: 7587226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Food and Drug Administration and atrial defibrillation devices.
Chen L; Keane AT; Every NR
Am J Manag Care; 1999 Jul; 5(7):899-909. PubMed ID: 10557410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spinal devices in the United States-investigational device exemption trials and premarket approval of class III devices.
Golish SR; Reed ML
Spine J; 2017 Jan; 17(1):150-157. PubMed ID: 27737804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulation of medical devices in radiology: current standards and future opportunities.
Smith JJ
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 11161144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical devices; general hospital and personal use monitoring devices; classification of the ingestible event marker. Final order.
Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Fed Regist; 2013 May; 78(95):28733-5. PubMed ID: 23678675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical devices; apnea monitor; special controls. Final rule.
Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Fed Regist; 2002 Jul; 67(137):46851-2. PubMed ID: 12125715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Overview of the 2016 U.S. Food and Drug Administration Circulatory System Devices Advisory Panel Meeting on the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System.
Steinvil A; Rogers T; Torguson R; Waksman R
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Sep; 9(17):1757-64. PubMed ID: 27609249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Who is responsible for evaluating the safety and effectiveness of medical devices? The role of independent technology assessment.
Feldman MD; Petersen AJ; Karliner LS; Tice JA
J Gen Intern Med; 2008 Jan; 23 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):57-63. PubMed ID: 18095046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Software-Related Recalls of Health Information Technology and Other Medical Devices: Implications for FDA Regulation of Digital Health.
Ronquillo JG; Zuckerman DM
Milbank Q; 2017 Sep; 95(3):535-553. PubMed ID: 28895231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposed FDA "unsafe" lead wire ban could affect many medical devices.
Hosp Technol Ser; 1995 Jul; 14(7):12-4. PubMed ID: 10144657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pivotal trials of orthopedic surgical devices in the United States: predominance of two-arm non-inferiority designs.
Golish SR
Trials; 2017 Jul; 18(1):348. PubMed ID: 28738891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrasting clinical evidence for market authorisation of cardio-vascular devices in Europe and the USA: a systematic analysis of 10 devices based on Austrian pre-reimbursement assessments.
Wild C; Erdös J; Zechmeister I
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2014 Nov; 14():154. PubMed ID: 25366498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical device regulation for manufacturers.
McAllister P; Jeswiet J
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 14702983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of Clinical Studies Conducted Over the Total Product Life Cycle of High-Risk Therapeutic Medical Devices Receiving FDA Premarket Approval in 2010 and 2011.
Rathi VK; Krumholz HM; Masoudi FA; Ross JS
JAMA; 2015 Aug; 314(6):604-12. PubMed ID: 26262798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. More than standards and regulations are needed to provide safe and effective devices.
Levin M
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2001; 35(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 11668950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How do Orthopaedic Devices Change After Their Initial FDA Premarket Approval?
Samuel AM; Rathi VK; Grauer JN; Ross JS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):1053-68. PubMed ID: 26584802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID): Registry assessment of peripheral interventional devices core data elements.
Jones WS; Krucoff MW; Morales P; Wilgus RW; Heath AH; Williams MF; Tcheng JE; Marinac-Dabic JD; Malone ML; Reed TL; Fukaya R; Lookstein RA; Handa N; Aronow HD; Bertges DJ; Jaff MR; Tsai TT; Smale JA; Zaugg MJ; Thatcher RJ; Cronenwett JL
J Vasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 67(2):637-644.e30. PubMed ID: 29389426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical devices; patient examination and surgeons' gloves; test procedures and acceptance criteria. Final rule.
Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Fed Regist; 2006 Dec; 71(243):75865-79. PubMed ID: 17294550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [An exploratory discussion on biological evaluation and risks for medical devices].
Sun J
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 30(5):386-7, 382. PubMed ID: 17165574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
