These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7587522)

  • 21. A study of Korean femoral geometry.
    Khang G; Choi K; Kim CS; Yang JS; Bae TS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Jan; (406):116-22. PubMed ID: 12579009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur.
    Husmann O; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz PF; de Roguin B; Argenson JN
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Jun; 12(4):444-50. PubMed ID: 9195321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Radiologic changes of anatomic parameters of the proximal femur as a function of its position in rotation].
    Rubin PJ; Leyvraz PF; Heegaard JH
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1989; 75(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 2781066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automated method for computing the morphological and clinical parameters of the proximal femur using heuristic modeling techniques.
    Cerveri P; Marchente M; Bartels W; Corten K; Simon JP; Manzotti A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 38(5):1752-66. PubMed ID: 20177779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diversity of proximal femoral medullary canal.
    Laine HJ; Lehto MU; Moilanen T
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jan; 15(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10654468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Increasing shape modelling accuracy by adjusting for subject positioning: an application to the analysis of radiographic proximal femur symmetry using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.
    Lindner C; Wallis GA; Cootes TF
    Bone; 2014 Apr; 61(100):64-70. PubMed ID: 24440168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Morphology of the Proximal Femoral Canal Continues to Change in the Very Elderly: Implications for Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Boymans TA; Heyligers IC; Grimm B
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2328-32. PubMed ID: 26187385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.
    Benoist J; Lambotte JC; Polard JL; Huten D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 24211127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Changes in the femoral cortex as related to prosthetic stem.
    Toni A; Fabbri F; Scimeca GB; Paderni S; Testoni M; Baruffaldi F; Giunti A
    Chir Organi Mov; 1998; 83(4):323-35. PubMed ID: 10369012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical accuracy evaluation of femoral canal preparation using the ROBODOC system.
    Nishihara S; Sugano N; Nishii T; Tanaka H; Nakamura N; Yoshikawa H; Ochi T
    J Orthop Sci; 2004; 9(5):452-61. PubMed ID: 15449120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical outcome and quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design. A prospective study.
    Pitto RP; Schramm M; Hohmann D; Schmidt R
    Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):87-97. PubMed ID: 12025051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How many different types of femora are there in primary hip osteoarthritis? An active shape modeling study.
    Merle C; Waldstein W; Gregory JS; Goodyear SR; Aspden RM; Aldinger PR; Murray DW; Gill HS
    J Orthop Res; 2014 Mar; 32(3):413-22. PubMed ID: 24249665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The reconstruction of three-dimension morphology of proximal femur].
    Wang W; Wang Y; Cui J; Han G
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 41(10):744-8. PubMed ID: 14766046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Total hip arthroplasty in congenital dislocated hips.
    Mendes DG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1981; (161):163-79. PubMed ID: 7332639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur.
    Noble PC; Box GG; Kamaric E; Fink MJ; Alexander JW; Tullos HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Jul; (316):31-44. PubMed ID: 7634721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].
    Migaud H; Jardin C; Fontaine C; Pierchon F; d'Herbomez O; Duquennoy A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 9452810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Osteometry of the femora in Turkish individuals: a morphometric study in 114 cadaveric femora as an anatomic basis of femoral component design].
    Atilla B; Oznur A; Cağlar O; Tokgözoğlu M; Alpaslan M
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2007; 41(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17483639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative study of femoral diaphyseal morphometry in two male populations, in France and a French West Indies island: an example of clinical relevance of comparative anatomy for orthopedic practice.
    Uzel AP; Deloumeaux J; Rouvillain JL; Laflamme GY; Durandeau A; Caix P
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2011 Apr; 33(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 20811893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiological aspects in preoperative planning and postoperative assessment of cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Linclau L; Dokter G; Peene P
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 8372651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Morphological divergence in the curvature of human femoral diaphyses: Tracing the central mass distributions of cross-sections.
    Imamura T; Ogami-Takamura K; Saiki K; Hamamoto A; Endo D; Murai K; Nishi K; Sakamoto J; Okamoto K; Oyamada J; Manabe Y; Tsurumoto T
    J Anat; 2021 Jul; 239(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 33527352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.