These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7589623)

  • 1. No correlation between peritubal and mucosal adhesions in hydrosalpinges.
    Vasquez G; Boeckx W; Brosens I
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Nov; 64(5):1032-3. PubMed ID: 7589623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective study of tubal mucosal lesions and fertility in hydrosalpinges.
    Vasquez G; Boeckx W; Brosens I
    Hum Reprod; 1995 May; 10(5):1075-8. PubMed ID: 7657744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical Video: Bilateral Tubal Adhesiolysis With Cuff Salpingostomy.
    Shakir F; Kent A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):163. PubMed ID: 26454193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation between the American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions and distal tubal occlusion, salpingoscopy, and reproductive outcome in tubal surgery.
    Marana R; Rizzi M; Muzii L; Catalano GF; Caruana P; Mancuso S
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Nov; 64(5):924-9. PubMed ID: 7589635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peritubal adhesions in infertile women: diagnosis with hysterosalpingography.
    Karasick S; Goldfarb AF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Apr; 152(4):777-9. PubMed ID: 2784261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic salpingostomy: fertility results according to the tubal mucosal appearance.
    Dubuisson JB; Chapron C; Morice P; Aubriot FX; Foulot H; Bouquet de Jolinière J
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Feb; 9(2):334-9. PubMed ID: 8027292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prevalence of chronic endometritis in patients with infertility due to hydrosalpinx or pelvic peritubal adhesions and effect of laparoscopic surgical correction on pregnancy rates post in vitro fertilization.
    Osada H; Seto M; Nakase K; Ezoe K; Miyauchi O; Fujita H; Miyakawa Y; Nagaishi M; Kato K; Teramoto S; Shozu M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 May; 284():143-149. PubMed ID: 36996643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Salpingostomy and the resection of tubal adhesions by microsurgery].
    Nava Y Sánchez RM; Rosas Arceo J; Gorostieta García EA
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1987 Sep; 55():239-44. PubMed ID: 3154205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Microsurgery of distal tubal lesions. Analysis of 270 operated cases].
    Donnez J; Casanas-Roux F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 3734348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Related factors associated with pelvic adhesion and its influence on fallopian tube recanalization in infertile patients].
    Hou HY; Chen YQ; Chen X; Hu CX; Yang ZH; Chen J; Kong XL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 47(11):823-8. PubMed ID: 23302122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Restoration of the reproductive function in women with tubal infertility by the method of plastic microsurgery of the fallopian tubes].
    Aĭlamazian EK; Trubachev VI; Gorbunov GN
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1989 Jul; (7):45-7. PubMed ID: 2679183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Abdominopelvic and Fallopian Tube Findings Before and After Antitubercular Therapy in Female Genital Tuberculosis With Infertility.
    Sharma JB; Sneha J; Singh UB; Kumar S; Roy KK; Singh N; Dharmendra S; Vanamail P
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 26455527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure.
    Winston RM; Margara RA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 1832011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors influencing the success of microsurgery for distal tubal occlusion.
    Laatikainen TJ; Tenhunen AK; Venesmaa PK; Apter DL
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1988; 243(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 3401038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Usefulness and results of microsurgery in the treatment of female sterility].
    Fioretti P; Teti G; Maffei S; Murru MS
    Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1990; 111(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 2088155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Tuboperitoneal sterility. Indications, operative techniques and results of adhesiolysis and distal tuboplasties].
    Dubuisson JB
    Rev Prat; 1991 Dec; 41(25):2559-62. PubMed ID: 1839456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Degree of endosalpingeal deciliation (by S.E.M.) in hydrosalpinx is not prognostic for post-surgical fertility.
    Fedele L; Zamberletti D; Marchini M; Vercellini P; Cavalli G
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1984; 15(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 6485710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there a role for hysteroscopic tubal occlusion of functionless hydrosalpinges prior to IVF/ICSI in modern practice?
    Darwish AM; El Saman AM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(12):1484-9. PubMed ID: 18027115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hydrosalpinx - Salpingostomy, salpingectomy or tubal occlusion.
    Ng KYB; Cheong Y
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Aug; 59():41-47. PubMed ID: 30824209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of ampullary assessment by falloposcopy and salpingoscopy.
    Scudamore IW; Dunphy BC; Bowman M; Jenkins J; Cooke ID
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Aug; 9(8):1516-8. PubMed ID: 7989515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.