These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7591092)

  • 1. Changes to the ocular biota with time in extended- and daily-wear disposable contact lens use.
    Stapleton F; Willcox MD; Fleming CM; Hickson S; Sweeney DF; Holden BA
    Infect Immun; 1995 Nov; 63(11):4501-5. PubMed ID: 7591092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lid and conjunctival micro biota during contact lens wear in children.
    Sankaridurg PR; Markoulli M; de la Jara PL; Harmis N; Varghese T; Willcox MD; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 86(4):312-7. PubMed ID: 19348019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective Assessment of Ocular Surface Response to Contact Lens Wear in Presbyopic Contact Lens Wearers of Asian Descent.
    Guillon M; Dumbleton K; Theodoratos P; Patel T; Karkkainen T; Moody K
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 May; 44(3):182-189. PubMed ID: 27755285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lid Margin Sensitivity and Staining in Contact Lens Wear Versus No Lens Wear.
    Navascues-Cornago M; Morgan PB; Maldonado-Codina C
    Cornea; 2015 Jul; 34(7):808-16. PubMed ID: 25933399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective trial of daily and extended wear disposable contact lenses.
    Levy B; McNamara N; Corzine J; Abbott RL
    Cornea; 1997 May; 16(3):274-6. PubMed ID: 9143797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lid Wiper Microvascular Responses as an Indicator of Contact Lens Discomfort.
    Deng Z; Wang J; Jiang H; Fadli Z; Liu C; Tan J; Zhou J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 170():197-205. PubMed ID: 27542928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Daily versus monthly disposable contact lens: Which is better for ocular surface physiology and comfort?
    Sapkota K; Franco S; Lira M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Jun; 41(3):252-257. PubMed ID: 29221708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear.
    Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB; Efron N; Efron S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):536-48. PubMed ID: 15976592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification and enumeration of staphylococci from the eye during soft contact lens wear.
    Leitch EC; Harmis NY; Corrigan KM; Willcox MD
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Apr; 75(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 9586750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disposable contact lens use as a risk factor for microbial keratitis.
    Radford CF; Minassian DC; Dart JK
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1998 Nov; 82(11):1272-5. PubMed ID: 9924331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bacterial populations on 30-night extended wear silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Keay L; Willcox MD; Sweeney DF; Morris CA; Harmis N; Corrigan K; Holden BA
    CLAO J; 2001 Jan; 27(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 11215603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative alterations of the commensal eye bacteria in contact lens wear.
    Larkin DF; Leeming JP
    Eye (Lond); 1991; 5 ( Pt 1)():70-4. PubMed ID: 2060675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of patients who report compliant and non-compliant overnight wear of soft contact lenses.
    Jansen ME; Chalmers R; Mitchell GL; Kinoshita BT; Lam DY; McMahon TT; Richdale K; Sorbara L; Wagner H
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2011 Oct; 34(5):229-35. PubMed ID: 21345717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk factors for contact lens bacterial contamination during continuous wear.
    Szczotka-Flynn LB; Bajaksouzian S; Jacobs MR; Rimm A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 86(11):1216-26. PubMed ID: 19786927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential sources of bacteria that are isolated from contact lenses during wear.
    Willcox MD; Power KN; Stapleton F; Leitch C; Harmis N; Sweeney DF
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Dec; 74(12):1030-8. PubMed ID: 9423995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting success with silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in new wearers.
    Best N; Drury L; Wolffsohn JS
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Oct; 36(5):232-7. PubMed ID: 23522993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of extended-wear soft contact lenses on the ocular surface and central corneal thickness.
    Gürdal C; Aydin S; Kirimlioğlu H; Toprak E; Sengör T
    Ophthalmologica; 2003; 217(5):329-36. PubMed ID: 12913322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of previous extended and daily wear schedules on signs and symptoms with high Dk lotrafilcon A lenses.
    Chalmers RL; Dillehay S; Long B; Barr JT; Bergenske P; Donshik P; Secor G; Yoakum J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):549-54. PubMed ID: 15976593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft Contact Lens-Related Symptoms in North America and the United Kingdom.
    Chalmers RL; Young G; Kern J; Napier L; Hunt C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):836-47. PubMed ID: 27391535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conjunctival Microbiome Changes Associated With Soft Contact Lens and Orthokeratology Lens Wearing.
    Zhang H; Zhao F; Hutchinson DS; Sun W; Ajami NJ; Lai S; Wong MC; Petrosino JF; Fang J; Jiang J; Chen W; Reinach PS; Qu J; Zeng C; Zhang D; Zhou X
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Jan; 58(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 28114568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.