These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7591339)

  • 1. A comparison of the hypnotic experience between signing deaf and hearing participants.
    Matthews WJ; Isenberg GL
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Oct; 43(4):375-85. PubMed ID: 7591339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hypnotic inductions with deaf and hearing subjects--an initial comparison: a brief communication.
    Matthews WJ; Isenberg GL
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1992 Jan; 40(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 1541577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hypnotic responsivity of the deaf: the development of the University of Tennessee Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale for the Deaf.
    Repka RJ; Nash MR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Jul; 43(3):316-31. PubMed ID: 7635582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hypnosis with signing deaf and hearing subjects.
    Isenberg GL; Matthews WJ
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1995 Jul; 38(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 8533737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 40-Hz EEG activity during hypnotic induction and hypnotic testing.
    DePascalis V; Penna PM
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Apr; 38(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 2347669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of hypnosis in a deaf patient with multiple personality disorder: a case report.
    Bowman ES; Coons PM
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1990 Oct; 33(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 2270843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responding to hypnotic and nonhypnotic suggestions: performance standards, imaginative suggestibility, and response expectancies.
    Meyer EC; Lynn SJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2011 Jul; 59(3):327-49. PubMed ID: 21644124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A note of caution on the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility: a brief communication.
    Cardeña E; Terhune DB
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2009 Apr; 57(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 19234968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Italian norms for the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C.
    De Pascalis V; Bellusci A; Russo PM
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2000 Jul; 48(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 10902296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Not all group hypnotic suggestibility scales are created equal: individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses.
    Barnes SM; Lynn SJ; Pekala RJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 18778955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The phenomenology of the experiences and the depth of hypnosis: comparison of direct and indirect induction techniques.
    Szabó C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jul; 41(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 8335421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working hypnotically with deaf people.
    Isenberg GL; Matthews WJ
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1991 Oct; 34(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 1957813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The efficacy of the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility: form C.
    Moran TE; Kurtz RM; Strube MJ
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2002; 44(3-4):221-30. PubMed ID: 11799536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: accuracy of self-report and the memory for items.
    Younger J; Kemmerer DD; Winkel JD; Nash MR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2005 Jul; 53(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 16076667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility: normative and comparative data.
    Bowers KS
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jan; 41(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 8425774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement.
    Cattani A; Clibbens J; Perfect TJ
    Neuropsychology; 2007 Jan; 21(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 17201534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of spatial attention on motion processing in deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners.
    Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):152-69. PubMed ID: 12027400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hypnosis, suggestion type, and subjective experience--the order-effects hypothesis revisited: a brief communication.
    Weekes JR; Lynn SJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Apr; 38(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 2347670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Portuguese norms for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility.
    Carvalho C; Kirsch I; Mazzoni G; Leal I
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2008 Jul; 56(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 18569140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mexican norms for the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C.
    Sánchez-Armáss O; Barabasz AF
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2005 Jul; 53(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 16076668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.