217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7591508)
1. Visual field asymmetry in facial affect perception: moderating effects of hypnosis, hypnotic susceptibility level, absorption, and sustained attentional abilities.
Crawford HJ; Harrison DW; Kapelis L
Int J Neurosci; 1995 May; 82(1-2):11-23. PubMed ID: 7591508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Self-generated happy and sad emotions in low and highly hypnotizable persons during waking and hypnosis: laterality and regional EEG activity differences.
Crawford HJ; Clarke SW; Kitner-Triolo M
Int J Psychophysiol; 1996 Dec; 24(3):239-66. PubMed ID: 8993998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 40-Hz EEG asymmetry during recall of emotional events in waking and hypnosis: differences between low and high hypnotizables.
De Pascalis V; Marucci FS; Penna PM
Int J Psychophysiol; 1989 Mar; 7(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 2925468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory event-related potentials while ignoring tone stimuli: attentional differences reflected in stimulus intensity and latency responses in low and highly hypnotizable persons.
Crawford HJ; Corby JC; Kopell BS
Int J Neurosci; 1996 Mar; 85(1-2):57-69. PubMed ID: 8727682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sustained attentional and disattentional abilities: differences between low and highly hypnotizable persons.
Crawford HJ; Brown AM; Moon CE
J Abnorm Psychol; 1993 Nov; 102(4):534-43. PubMed ID: 8282921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional asymmetry for facial affect perception in high and low hostile men and women.
Harrison DW; Gorelczenko PM
Int J Neurosci; 1990 Dec; 55(2-4):89-97. PubMed ID: 2084054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemispheric asymmetry as a function of handedness: perception of facial affect stimuli.
Everhart DE; Harrison DW; Crews WD
Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Feb; 82(1):264-6. PubMed ID: 8668485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Paired-associate learning and recall of high and low imagery words: moderating effects of hypnosis, hypnotic susceptibility level, and visualization abilities.
Crawford HJ; Allen SN
Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(3):353-72. PubMed ID: 8837407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemispheric activity of 40 Hz EEG during recall of emotional events: differences between low and high hypnotizables.
De Pascalis V; Marucci FS; Penna PM; Pessa E
Int J Psychophysiol; 1987 Oct; 5(3):167-80. PubMed ID: 3679942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Functional asymmetry and interhemispheric cooperation in the perception of emotions from facial expressions.
Tamietto M; Latini Corazzini L; de Gelder B; Geminiani G
Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):389-404. PubMed ID: 16374630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hypnosis and hemispheric asymmetry.
Naish PL
Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):230-4. PubMed ID: 19900824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex differences in the functional asymmetry for facial affect perception.
Harrison DW; Gorelczenko PM; Cook J
Int J Neurosci; 1990 May; 52(1-2):11-6. PubMed ID: 2265918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of hypnotizability on performance of a Stroop task and event-related potentials.
Nordby H; Hugdahl K; Jasiukaitis P; Spiegel D
Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Jun; 88(3 Pt 1):819-30. PubMed ID: 10407889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EEG asymmetry and heart rate during experience of hypnotic analgesia in high and low hypnotizables.
De Pascalis V; Perrone M
Int J Psychophysiol; 1996; 21(2-3):163-75. PubMed ID: 8792204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhanced visual memory during hypnosis as mediated by hypnotic responsiveness and cognitive strategies.
Crawford HJ; Allen SN
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Dec; 112(4):662-685. PubMed ID: 6229599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cerebral asymmetry in facial affect perception by women: neuropsychological effects of depressed mood.
Crews WD; Harrison DW
Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Dec; 79(3 Pt 2):1667-79. PubMed ID: 7870560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Models of hemispheric specialization in facial emotion perception--a reevaluation.
Najt P; Bayer U; Hausmann M
Emotion; 2013 Feb; 13(1):159-67. PubMed ID: 22906088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decoding facial blends of emotion: visual field, attentional and hemispheric biases.
Ross ED; Shayya L; Champlain A; Monnot M; Prodan CI
Brain Cogn; 2013 Dec; 83(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 24091036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe.
Egner T; Jamieson G; Gruzelier J
Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 27(4):969-78. PubMed ID: 15964211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Brain dynamics and hypnosis: attentional and disattentional processes.
Crawford HJ
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1994 Jul; 42(3):204-32. PubMed ID: 8063461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
