These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7591508)

  • 1. Visual field asymmetry in facial affect perception: moderating effects of hypnosis, hypnotic susceptibility level, absorption, and sustained attentional abilities.
    Crawford HJ; Harrison DW; Kapelis L
    Int J Neurosci; 1995 May; 82(1-2):11-23. PubMed ID: 7591508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-generated happy and sad emotions in low and highly hypnotizable persons during waking and hypnosis: laterality and regional EEG activity differences.
    Crawford HJ; Clarke SW; Kitner-Triolo M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1996 Dec; 24(3):239-66. PubMed ID: 8993998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 40-Hz EEG asymmetry during recall of emotional events in waking and hypnosis: differences between low and high hypnotizables.
    De Pascalis V; Marucci FS; Penna PM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1989 Mar; 7(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 2925468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory event-related potentials while ignoring tone stimuli: attentional differences reflected in stimulus intensity and latency responses in low and highly hypnotizable persons.
    Crawford HJ; Corby JC; Kopell BS
    Int J Neurosci; 1996 Mar; 85(1-2):57-69. PubMed ID: 8727682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sustained attentional and disattentional abilities: differences between low and highly hypnotizable persons.
    Crawford HJ; Brown AM; Moon CE
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1993 Nov; 102(4):534-43. PubMed ID: 8282921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional asymmetry for facial affect perception in high and low hostile men and women.
    Harrison DW; Gorelczenko PM
    Int J Neurosci; 1990 Dec; 55(2-4):89-97. PubMed ID: 2084054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemispheric asymmetry as a function of handedness: perception of facial affect stimuli.
    Everhart DE; Harrison DW; Crews WD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Feb; 82(1):264-6. PubMed ID: 8668485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paired-associate learning and recall of high and low imagery words: moderating effects of hypnosis, hypnotic susceptibility level, and visualization abilities.
    Crawford HJ; Allen SN
    Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(3):353-72. PubMed ID: 8837407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hemispheric activity of 40 Hz EEG during recall of emotional events: differences between low and high hypnotizables.
    De Pascalis V; Marucci FS; Penna PM; Pessa E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1987 Oct; 5(3):167-80. PubMed ID: 3679942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional asymmetry and interhemispheric cooperation in the perception of emotions from facial expressions.
    Tamietto M; Latini Corazzini L; de Gelder B; Geminiani G
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):389-404. PubMed ID: 16374630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hypnosis and hemispheric asymmetry.
    Naish PL
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):230-4. PubMed ID: 19900824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex differences in the functional asymmetry for facial affect perception.
    Harrison DW; Gorelczenko PM; Cook J
    Int J Neurosci; 1990 May; 52(1-2):11-6. PubMed ID: 2265918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of hypnotizability on performance of a Stroop task and event-related potentials.
    Nordby H; Hugdahl K; Jasiukaitis P; Spiegel D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Jun; 88(3 Pt 1):819-30. PubMed ID: 10407889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EEG asymmetry and heart rate during experience of hypnotic analgesia in high and low hypnotizables.
    De Pascalis V; Perrone M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1996; 21(2-3):163-75. PubMed ID: 8792204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhanced visual memory during hypnosis as mediated by hypnotic responsiveness and cognitive strategies.
    Crawford HJ; Allen SN
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Dec; 112(4):662-685. PubMed ID: 6229599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cerebral asymmetry in facial affect perception by women: neuropsychological effects of depressed mood.
    Crews WD; Harrison DW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Dec; 79(3 Pt 2):1667-79. PubMed ID: 7870560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Models of hemispheric specialization in facial emotion perception--a reevaluation.
    Najt P; Bayer U; Hausmann M
    Emotion; 2013 Feb; 13(1):159-67. PubMed ID: 22906088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decoding facial blends of emotion: visual field, attentional and hemispheric biases.
    Ross ED; Shayya L; Champlain A; Monnot M; Prodan CI
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Dec; 83(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 24091036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe.
    Egner T; Jamieson G; Gruzelier J
    Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 27(4):969-78. PubMed ID: 15964211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brain dynamics and hypnosis: attentional and disattentional processes.
    Crawford HJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1994 Jul; 42(3):204-32. PubMed ID: 8063461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.