These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7591660)

  • 21. Ethical issues and the right to die.
    Flarey DL
    Lippincotts Case Manag; 2005; 10(5):228-31. PubMed ID: 16205203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The right to die.
    Powell JA; Cohen AS
    Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 7960664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In re Martin.
    Michigan. Supreme Court
    North West Rep Second Ser; 1995 Aug; 538():399-420. PubMed ID: 12041171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Revising the substituted judgment standard.
    Baergen R
    J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 7632994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 2008-2009 National Health Law Moot Court Competition: best brief.
    Bonsall L; Weber T
    J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):467-94. PubMed ID: 19953403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. 2008-2009 National Health Law Moot Court Competition: problem.
    Pope T
    J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):443-66. PubMed ID: 19953402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Informed consent: from the ambivalence of Arato to the thunder of Thor.
    Arabian A
    Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(3):261-98. PubMed ID: 7829305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The limits of proxy decision making: undertreatment.
    Gillick MR; Fried T
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1995; 4(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 7655668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Discontinuing life support in an infant of a drug-addicted mother: whose decision is it?
    Jain R; Thomasma DC
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1997; 6(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 9111961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impairments and impediments in patients' decision making: reframing the competence question.
    Morreim EH
    J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(4):294-307; discussion 340-1. PubMed ID: 7803824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Approaches (and possible contraindications) to enhancing patients' autonomy.
    Howe EG
    J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 7841467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment.
    Sappington GM
    J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):341-55. PubMed ID: 3490528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diminished autonomy: can a person with dementia consent to dental treatment?
    Chiodo GT; Tolle SW
    Gen Dent; 1992; 40(5):372-3. PubMed ID: 1291429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In re Browning.
    Brockmann J
    Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(3):347-50. PubMed ID: 1765453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Medical futility: a futile concept?
    Shiner K
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1996; 53(2):803-48. PubMed ID: 11656798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Terri Schiavo--a tragedy compounded.
    Quill TE
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Apr; 352(16):1630-3. PubMed ID: 15784658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Moral consensus in public ethics: patient autonomy and family decision-making in the work of one state bioethics commission.
    Moskowitz EH
    J Med Philos; 1996 Apr; 21(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 8739070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Helga Wanglie revisited: medical futility and the limits of autonomy.
    Johnson DH
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 8293205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Should it be mandated that an HEC review a physician's decision not to honor a patient's or surrogate's refusal of treatment?
    DeRenzo EG; Olick RS
    HEC Forum; 2000 Jun; 12(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 11066195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
    Bopp J; Coleson RE
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.