These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 759316)
1. Current status of the law of consent to treatment. Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1979 Feb; 53(3):83-5, 87. PubMed ID: 759316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Compensating injured research subjects: II. The law. Robertson JA Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Dec; 6(6):29-31. PubMed ID: 993011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Physicians with AIDS: a proposal for efficient disclosure. Hertz J Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(2):749-78. PubMed ID: 11659904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimentation and research. Annas GJ J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11653330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The law of informed consent: from "doctor is right" to "patient has rights". Kurtz SF Syracuse Law Rev; 2000; 50(4):1243-60. PubMed ID: 16528861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Registration is not informed consent: the swine flu program revisited. Pavarini PA Public Health Rep; 1981; 96(3):287-8. PubMed ID: 7232692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The lay standard of informed consent: theoretical and practical problems with Maryland's new cause of action. MD Law Rev; 1978; 38(2):320-65. PubMed ID: 11665126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent: looking for the action. Riskin LL Univ Ill Law Forum; 1975; 1975(4):580-611. PubMed ID: 11664566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Liability and compensation aspects of immunization injury: a call for reform. McIntosh WK Osgoode Hall Law J; 1980 Dec; 18(4):584-613. PubMed ID: 11658622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reverse informed consent: the unreasonably dangerous patient. Oddi AS Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1993 Nov; 46(6):1417-83. PubMed ID: 11659884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. On not compensating for bad outcomes to biomedical innovations: a response and modest proposal. Weisbard AJ Cardozo Law Rev; 1987 Aug; 8(6):1161-88. PubMed ID: 11658860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tardive dyskinesia: medical facts and legal fictions. Taub S St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):833-75. PubMed ID: 11649880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The great "informed consent" debate: should the disclosure of risks and alternatives by physicians be standard pre-operating procedure? Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1983 Apr; 72(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 6854163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations. Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Recent developments in consent to treatment--Part 1. Creighton H Superv Nurse; 1981 Jun; 12(6):12-4. PubMed ID: 6910272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent: does the consent process reflect the realities of current treatment, procedures, and side effects? Monaco GP Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 1983; 5(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 6367522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Malpractice: questions of consent in connection with treatment of genital or urinary organs. Frantz LB Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1979; 89():32-77. PubMed ID: 12091927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The second revolution in informed consent: comparing physicians to each other. Twerski AD; Cohen NB Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1999; 94(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 12455555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]