123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7593482)
1. Potential health problems stemming from assisted reproduction programmes.
Seamark RF; Robinson JS
Hum Reprod; 1995 Jun; 10(6):1321-2. PubMed ID: 7593482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Infertility, assisted reproduction programmes and public health.
Kaminski M; Garel M
Hum Reprod; 1995 Jun; 10(6):1328-9. PubMed ID: 7593486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted reproduction: a not so bright future?
Benagiano G; Rowe PJ
Hum Reprod; 1995 Jun; 10(6):1324-6. PubMed ID: 7593484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Recent advances in medically assisted conception. Report of a WHO Scientific Group.
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser; 1992; 820():1-111. PubMed ID: 1642014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro fertilization, gamete intrafallopian transfer, and superovulation with intrauterine insemination: efficacy and potential health hazards on babies delivered.
Dawood MY
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Apr; 174(4):1208-17. PubMed ID: 8623848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic risk in micromanipulative assisted reproduction.
Meschede D; De Geyter C; Nieschlag E; Horst J
Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):2880-6. PubMed ID: 8747037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted conception and immunological infertility.
Cimino C; Catalano G; Cittadini E
Acta Eur Fertil; 1995; 26(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 8923912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complications of assisted reproductive techniques.
Schenker JG; Ezra Y
Fertil Steril; 1994 Mar; 61(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 8137959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Nachtigall RD
West J Med; 1996 Dec; 165(6):373. PubMed ID: 9000859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. GIFT-ICSI for the treatment of male-factor infertility for patients with religious objections to in vitro fertilization: a case report.
Allan JA; Cotman AS
J Assist Reprod Genet; 1999 Feb; 16(2):108-9. PubMed ID: 10357584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Hydatidiform moles associated with multiple gestations after assisted reproduction: diagnosis by analysis of DNA fingerprint.
Shozu M; Akimoto K; Kasai T; Inoue M; Michikura Y
Mol Hum Reprod; 1998 Sep; 4(9):877-80. PubMed ID: 9783848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What factors predetermine the risk of having a high-order multiple pregnancy with gamete intra-fallopian transfer?
Nadkarni P; Shrivastav P; Bharath M; Craft I
Hum Reprod; 1996 Mar; 11(3):655-9. PubMed ID: 8671286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bioethics in medically assisted conception in the Muslim world.
Serour GI; Aboulghar MA; Mansour RT
J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Oct; 12(9):559-65. PubMed ID: 8580648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Paternal contribution to successful embryogenesis.
Ménézo Y; Dale B
Hum Reprod; 1995 Jun; 10(6):1326-8. PubMed ID: 7593485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Only an attitude away: the potential of reproductive surrogacy.
Sandberg EC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jun; 160(6):1441-6. PubMed ID: 2660571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Medically assisted procreation. Techniques and results].
Bulwa S
Soins Gynecol Obstet Pueric Pediatr; 1993 Apr; (143):13-21. PubMed ID: 8303526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Critical reappraisal of the clinical effectiveness of different methods of assisted fertilization.
Melis GB; Strigini F; Mais V; Paoletti AM; Olivieri L; Antinori D; Guerriero S; de Ruggiero A; Petacchi FD; Fioretti P
J Endocrinol Invest; 1990 Mar; 13(3):263-74. PubMed ID: 2195100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Artificial filiation. Medico-social, technical and legal prospectives of artificial procreation].
Gerli S; Angelini A; Affronti G; Gerli M
Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1988; 109(2):61-80. PubMed ID: 3052218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Assisted reproductive technology.
Tanbo T; Abyholm T
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Oct; 3(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 1958797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A bridge to intracytoplasmic sperm injection--high insemination concentrations benefit patients who have a reduced chance of fertilization with standard in-vitro fertilization.
Cowan DB; Santis M; Keefe T; Hargreaves CA; Howell RJ; Homa ST
Hum Reprod; 1996 Sep; 11(9):1985-9. PubMed ID: 8921076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
