These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 759352)
21. Abortion 1980: the debate continues. Healey JM Conn Med; 1980 Sep; 44(9):605. PubMed ID: 7408487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Supreme Court and abortion: 2. Sidestepping social realities. Mechanic D Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):17-9. PubMed ID: 7007284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test. Burdick R Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The abortion cases. Rust ME ABA J; 1986 Feb; 72():50-3. PubMed ID: 11655726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Killing "the handicapped" -- before and after birth. Field MA Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():79-138. PubMed ID: 11652872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Webster versus reproductive health services. Rhodes AM MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Inverting the viability test for abortion law. Ching B Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis. Linton PB Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose. Swyers MH Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Abortion 1982: the Supreme Court once again. Healey JM Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):681. PubMed ID: 7172671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is there life after Roe v. Wade? Mahowald MB Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):22-9. PubMed ID: 2663777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The abortion arena: recent activity. Goldstein LS; Comeau DJ Leg Med; 1982; ():213-26. PubMed ID: 7121180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Banning partial-birth abortions: a few inches away from testing post-viability jurisprudence. Flanagan PP Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):141-77. PubMed ID: 16514753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Abortion: the new debate. Callahan D Prim Care; 1986 Jun; 13(2):255-62. PubMed ID: 3523563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. So-called "partial birth abortion" bans: bad medicine? Maybe. Bad law? Definitely! Massie AM Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-80. PubMed ID: 11902179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Supreme court considers Morgentaler abortion case. Phillipson D Can Med Assoc J; 1974 Oct; 111(8):872-3. PubMed ID: 4419652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Aftermath of the abortion decisions: action in the legislatures and in the courts. Curran WJ N Engl J Med; 1973 Nov; 289(18):955. PubMed ID: 4743621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. State abortion statutes on the eve of the Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. Terwilliger LM J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jun; 25(6):161-74. PubMed ID: 10123589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]