These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7593928)

  • 1. Acoustic parameters of nasalized vowels in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing speakers.
    Chen MY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Nov; 98(5 Pt 1):2443-53. PubMed ID: 7593928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic correlates of English and French nasalized vowels.
    Chen MY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2360-70. PubMed ID: 9348695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic and perceptual correlates of the non-nasal--nasal distinction for vowels.
    Hawkins S; Stevens KN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Apr; 77(4):1560-75. PubMed ID: 3989111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An investigation of vowel organization in speakers with severe and profound hearing loss.
    McCaffrey HA; Sussman HM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Aug; 37(4):938-51. PubMed ID: 7967578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Ferguson SH; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jul; 112(1):259-71. PubMed ID: 12141351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of relative amplitude, presentation level, and vowel duration on perception of voiceless stop consonants by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hedrick MS; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3398-407. PubMed ID: 8914319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Formant Bandwidth as a Measure of Vowel Intelligibility in Dysphonic Speech.
    Ishikawa K; Webster J
    J Voice; 2023 Mar; 37(2):173-177. PubMed ID: 33143999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.
    Culling JF; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3454-67. PubMed ID: 8326071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vowel confusions of hearing-impaired listeners under reverberant and nonreverberant conditions.
    Nabelek AK; Letowski TR
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 3990258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting vowel formant discrimination by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2855-64. PubMed ID: 18189575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing impairment and vowel production. A comparison between normally hearing, hearing-aided and cochlear implanted Dutch children.
    Verhoeven J; Hide O; De Maeyer S; Gillis S; Gillis S
    J Commun Disord; 2016; 59():24-39. PubMed ID: 26629749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Studies on the spectrum features of nasalized vowels].
    Zhu H; Sun Y; Wang G
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Sep; 34(5):304-6. PubMed ID: 11776900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coarticulatory influences on the perceived height of nasal vowels.
    Krakow RA; Beddor PS; Goldstein LM; Fowler CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):1146-58. PubMed ID: 3356819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrality of nasalization and F1. II. Basic sensitivity and phonetic labeling measure distinct sensory and decision-rule interactions.
    Macmillan NA; Kingston J; Thorburn R; Dickey LW; Bartels C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2913-32. PubMed ID: 10573905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A practical method of estimating the time-varying degree of vowel nasalization from acoustic features.
    Carignan C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):911. PubMed ID: 33639809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of formant centralization ratio for vowel impairment detection in normal hearing and different degrees of hearing impairment.
    Naderifar E; Ghorbani A; Moradi N; Ansari H
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2019 Dec; 44(4):159-165. PubMed ID: 30644324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of speaking rate on nasality in the speech of hearing-impaired individuals.
    Dwyer CH; Robb MP; O'Beirne GA; Gilbert HR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 52(5):1321-33. PubMed ID: 19797139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vowel perception strategies of normal-hearing subjects and patients using Nucleus multichannel and 3M/House cochlear implants.
    Tartter VC; Hellman SA; Chute PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1269-83. PubMed ID: 1401515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic characteristics of vowels produced by Greek intelligible speakers with profound hearing impairment I: Examination of vowel space.
    Nicolaidis K; Sfakianaki A
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Aug; 18(4):378-87. PubMed ID: 27063696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.