These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Tools and techniques--statistics: how many variables are allowed in the logistic and Cox regression models? van Domburg R; Hoeks S; Kardys I; Lenzen M; Boersma E EuroIntervention; 2014; 9(12):1472-3. PubMed ID: 24755387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationships between categorical dependent variables and other variables and between waiting times and other variables. Shott S J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2011 Aug; 239(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 21801045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Different measures of treatment effect for different research questions. Austin PC J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 63(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 19837563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reuse of controls in nested case-control studies. Støer NC; Meyer HE; Samuelsen SO Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):315-7. PubMed ID: 24487222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. ["Razón relativa" and "tasa relativa" as translations of odds ratio and hazard ratio]. Bautista LE Bol Oficina Sanit Panam; 1995 Sep; 119(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 7576189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How to Clearly and Accurately Report Odds Ratio and Hazard Ratio in Diagnostic Research Studies? Park SH; Han K Korean J Radiol; 2022 Aug; 23(8):777-784. PubMed ID: 35695319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Interpretation of relative effects. Bangdiwala SI Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2017 Jun; 24(2):277-280. PubMed ID: 28362158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The poverty of epidemiology. Skrabanek P Perspect Biol Med; 1992; 35(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 1557296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Challenges in dia-prognostic research. Knottnerus JA J Epidemiol Community Health; 2002 May; 56(5):340-1. PubMed ID: 11964428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Modesty, uncertainty and pragmatism]. Poynard T Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1990; 14(6-7):600. PubMed ID: 2397872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Who will have the last word? Maronpot RR Toxicol Pathol; 2002; 30(3):297. PubMed ID: 12051545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Incremental prognostic value of single-photon emission computed tomography. Ferguson JG J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Nov; 26(6):1560-2. PubMed ID: 7594085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The incremental prognostic value of percentage of heart rate reserve achieved over myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in the prediction of cardiac death and all-cause mortality: superiority over 85% of maximal age-predicted heart rate. Azarbal B; Hayes SW; Lewin HC; Hachamovitch R; Cohen I; Berman DS J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul; 44(2):423-30. PubMed ID: 15261942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]