These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7594289)

  • 1. Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations.
    Wright TW; Hagen AD; Wood MB
    J Hand Surg Am; 1995 Jul; 20(4):619-22. PubMed ID: 7594289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees.
    Dudkiewicz I; Gabrielov R; Seiv-Ner I; Zelig G; Heim M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Jan; 26(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 14660200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prosthetic rehabilitation of geriatric amputee patients: a follow-up study.
    Steinberg FU; Sunwoo I; Roettger RF
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1985 Nov; 66(11):742-5. PubMed ID: 4062526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Management of the upper-limb-deficient child with a powered prosthetic device.
    Glynn MK; Galway HR; Hunter G; Sauter WF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Aug; (209):202-5. PubMed ID: 3731596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Body schema and body awareness of amputees.
    Mayer A; Kudar K; Bretz K; Tihanyi J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Sep; 32(3):363-82. PubMed ID: 18677671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prosthetic rehabilitation in traumatic upper limb amputees (an Indian perspective).
    Bhaskaranand K; Bhat AK; Acharya KN
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Sep; 123(7):363-6. PubMed ID: 12827395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses.
    Stein RB; Walley M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey.
    Østlie K; Lesjø IM; Franklin RJ; Garfelt B; Skjeldal OH; Magnus P
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Jul; 7(4):294-303. PubMed ID: 22112174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Composite forearm free fillet flaps to preserve stump length following traumatic amputations of the upper extremity.
    Flurry M; Melissinos EG; Livingston CK
    Ann Plast Surg; 2008 Apr; 60(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 18362566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: a comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses.
    Millstein SG; Heger H; Hunter GA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Apr; 10(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 3725563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional outcome following traumatic upper limb amputation and prosthetic limb fitting.
    Pinzur MS; Angelats J; Light TR; Izuierdo R; Pluth T
    J Hand Surg Am; 1994 Sep; 19(5):836-9. PubMed ID: 7806814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Better practical evaluation for lower limb amputees.
    Marzoug EA; Landham TL; Dance C; Bamji AN
    Disabil Rehabil; 2003 Sep; 25(18):1071-4. PubMed ID: 12944162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using the common sense self-regulation model to determine psychological predictors of prosthetic use and activity limitations in lower limb amputees.
    Callaghan B; Condie E; Johnston M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Sep; 32(3):324-36. PubMed ID: 18825576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Osseointegration amputation prostheses on the upper limbs: methods, prosthetics and rehabilitation.
    Jönsson S; Caine-Winterberger K; Brånemark R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):190-200. PubMed ID: 21697201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prosthetic harness adaptation.
    Dobner DL
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 May; 71(6):436-8. PubMed ID: 2334292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of above elbow body-powered prostheses in visually guided unconstrained motion tasks.
    Doeringer JA; Hogan N
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Jun; 42(6):621-31. PubMed ID: 7790019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Osseointegrated trans-femoral amputation prostheses: prospective results of general and condition-specific quality of life in 18 patients at 2-year follow-up.
    Hagberg K; Brånemark R; Gunterberg B; Rydevik B
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Mar; 32(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 18330803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees.
    Kejlaa GH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 8134275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Kinematic comparison of myoelectric and body powered prostheses while performing common activities.
    Carey SL; Dubey RV; Bauer GS; Highsmith MJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Jun; 33(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 19367522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Return to driving after lower-extremity amputation.
    Boulias C; Meikle B; Pauley T; Devlin M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 87(9):1183-8. PubMed ID: 16935052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.