BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7594744)

  • 1. Information management in the cardiology department. An analysis of current options for replacing cinefilm.
    Van Meurs BF
    Int J Card Imaging; 1995; 11 Suppl 3():159-63. PubMed ID: 7594744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Replacement of cinefilm with a digital archive and review network.
    Cusma JT; Wondrow MA; Holmes DR
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 10453381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Requirements for cardiac interchange media and the role of recordable CD.
    Condit PB
    Int J Card Imaging; 1995; 11 Suppl 3():153-7. PubMed ID: 7594743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Replacing cinefilm: motion or commotion?
    Aerts LM
    Int J Card Imaging; 1995; 11 Suppl 3():147-52. PubMed ID: 7594742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The DICOM standard. A breakthrough for digital information exchange in cardiology.
    Parisot C
    Int J Card Imaging; 1995; 11 Suppl 3():171-7. PubMed ID: 7594746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CD-based image archival and management on a hybrid radiology intranet.
    Cox RD; Henri CJ; Bret PM
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):168-70. PubMed ID: 9268870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital networking and archiving with ACOM T.O.P.
    Saalfrank W
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 10453385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Which media are most likely to solve the archival problem?
    Cusma JT; Fortin DF; Spero LA; Groshong BR; Bashore TM
    Int J Card Imaging; 1994 Sep; 10(3):165-75. PubMed ID: 7876656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The DICOM review stations: are they truly different?
    Goedhart B; Brand GJ; Reiber JH
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):317-22. PubMed ID: 10453384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DICOM media interchange standards for cardiology: initial interoperability demonstration.
    Elion JL
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1995; ():591-5. PubMed ID: 8563354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital image archiving: challenges and choices.
    Dumery B
    Radiol Manage; 2002; 24(3):30-8; quiz 39-41. PubMed ID: 12080930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The status of the GE approach to the digital catheterization laboratory.
    Herro PJ
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 10453386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Individual archiving of digital angiocardiograms].
    Stiel GM; Nienaber CA; Schaps KP; Meinertz T
    Z Kardiol; 1996 Aug; 85(8):553-60. PubMed ID: 8975495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Kodak approach to digital cardiovascular imaging laboratories.
    Pelanek GA
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 10453387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrated image storage solution for the Cath department.
    Weterings RA
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):349-56. PubMed ID: 10453389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cine film replacement: digital archival requirements and remaining obstacles.
    Holmes DR; Wondrow MA; Bell MR; Nissen SE; Cusma JT
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 Jul; 44(3):346-56; discussion 357. PubMed ID: 9676813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Digital archiving of imaged heart catheter studies on CD-R. Detection of irreversible CD damage].
    Erbel R; Ge J; Haude M
    Herz; 1998 Dec; 23(8):526-9. PubMed ID: 10023587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Picture archiving and communication in radiology.
    Napoli M; Nanni M; Cimarra S; Crisafulli L; Campioni P; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 14509181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Designing fault-tolerant distributed archives for picture archiving and communication systems.
    Mendenhall R; Dewey M; Soutar I
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):80-3. PubMed ID: 11442129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The hemodynamics laboratory without cine film. A comparison between the production costs of 35-mm film and the recordable compact disk].
    Danzi GB; Fiocca L; Dallavalle F; Capuano C; Chioin R; Riva S; Quaini E
    G Ital Cardiol; 1998 Aug; 28(8):887-92. PubMed ID: 9773314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.