These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7595154)

  • 1. Properties of hand-held spreaders after simulated use.
    Svec TA; Powers JM
    J Endod; 1995 Aug; 21(8):411-4. PubMed ID: 7595154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nickel-titanium versus stainless-steel finger spreaders in curved canals.
    Berry KA; Loushine RJ; Primack PD; Runyan DA
    J Endod; 1998 Nov; 24(11):752-4. PubMed ID: 9855827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of cleaning, chemical disinfection, and sterilization procedures on the mechanical properties of endodontic instruments.
    Haïkel Y; Serfaty R; Bleicher P; Lwin TT; Allemann C
    J Endod; 1997 Jan; 23(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 9594739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of spreader penetration during lateral compaction of .04 and .02 tapered gutta-percha.
    Wilson BL; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 2003 Dec; 29(12):828-31. PubMed ID: 14686816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Photoelastic comparison of stress induced by using stainless-steel versus nickel-titanium spreaders in vitro.
    Joyce AP; Loushine RJ; West LA; Runyan DA; Cameron SM
    J Endod; 1998 Nov; 24(11):714-5. PubMed ID: 9855819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless-steel spreader penetration and accessory cone fit in curved canals.
    Schmidt KJ; Walker TL; Johnson JD; Nicoll BK
    J Endod; 2000 Jan; 26(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 11194365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical properties of a new and improved nickel-titanium alloy for endodontic use: an evaluation of file flexibility.
    Gambarini G; Gerosa R; De Luca M; Garala M; Testarelli L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):798-800. PubMed ID: 18417388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of spreader size on fracture resistance of maxillary incisor roots.
    Pişkin B; Aydin B; Sarikanat M
    Int Endod J; 2008 Jan; 41(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 17916069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Morphological characteristics of spreaders].
    Malagnino VA; Gambarini G; De Luca M
    G Ital Endod; 1991; 5(3):96-101. PubMed ID: 1777685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical properties of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments and the effect of sodium hypochlorite treatment.
    Haïkel Y; Serfaty R; Wilson P; Speisser JM; Allemann C
    J Endod; 1998 Nov; 24(11):731-5. PubMed ID: 9855823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
    Pruett JP; Clement DJ; Carnes DL
    J Endod; 1997 Feb; 23(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 9220735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the apical condensation of gutta-percha by a tapered/calibrated spreader/plugger.
    Chohayeb AA
    J Endod; 1993 Apr; 19(4):167-9. PubMed ID: 8326260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Torsional testing of the Lightspeed nickel-titanium instrument system.
    Marsicovetere ES; Burgess JO; Clement DJ; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):681-4. PubMed ID: 9220755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimensional characterization and mechanical behaviour of K3 rotary instruments.
    Melo MC; Pereira ES; Viana AC; Fonseca AM; Buono VT; Bahia MG
    Int Endod J; 2008 Apr; 41(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 18217988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Torsional properties of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel endodontic files.
    Wolcott J; Himel VT
    J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 9594768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals.
    Kim HC; Kim HJ; Lee CJ; Kim BM; Park JK; Versluis A
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):593-602. PubMed ID: 19467053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Torsional strength of Gates Glidden drills exposed to clinical conditions.
    Svec TA; Powers JM
    J Endod; 1999 Feb; 25(2):126-7. PubMed ID: 10204471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of simulated clinical use on the torsional behavior of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
    Bahia MG; Melo MC; Buono VT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):675-80. PubMed ID: 16632283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength and elasticity of 4 long-term soft denture liners.
    Pinto JR; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):516-21. PubMed ID: 12474002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.