These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7595156)

  • 21. A comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium H-type instruments of identical design: torsional and bending tests.
    Kazemi RB; Stenman E; Spångberg LS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Oct; 90(4):500-6. PubMed ID: 11027388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of physical vapor deposition on cutting efficiency of nickel-titanium files.
    Schäfer E
    J Endod; 2002 Dec; 28(12):800-2. PubMed ID: 12489646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Glide path preparation in S-shaped canals with rotary pathfinding nickel-titanium instruments.
    Ajuz NC; Armada L; Gonçalves LS; Debelian G; Siqueira JF
    J Endod; 2013 Apr; 39(4):534-7. PubMed ID: 23522552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Root canal instruments for manual use: a review.
    Schäfer E
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1997 Apr; 13(2):51-64. PubMed ID: 9550031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Manual or rotary root canal preparation? Nickel-titanium or stainless steel? Review of the literature].
    Beun S; Bogaerts P; Van Nieuwenhuysen JP
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2005; 60(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 16082877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals.
    Coleman CL; Svec TA
    J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 9594772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cutting efficiency of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments and the effect of sodium hypochlorite treatment.
    Haïkel Y; Serfaty R; Wilson P; Speisser JM; Allemann C
    J Endod; 1998 Nov; 24(11):736-9. PubMed ID: 9855824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of elemental composition, microstructure, and hardness of stainless steel endodontic files and reamers.
    Darabara M; Bourithis L; Zinelis S; Papadimitriou GD
    J Endod; 2004 Jul; 30(7):523-6. PubMed ID: 15220651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of the machining efficiency of two brands of stainless steel endodontic hand files.
    Dearing GJ; Kazemi RB; Stevens RH
    J Endod; 2005 Dec; 31(12):873-6. PubMed ID: 16306821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of canal preparation using the K-file and Lightspeed in resin blocks.
    Tharuni SL; Parameswaran A; Sukumaran VG
    J Endod; 1996 Sep; 22(9):474-6. PubMed ID: 9198429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Anatomic Endodontic Technology (AET)--a crown-down root canal preparation technique: basic concepts, operative procedure and instruments.
    Riitano F
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):575-87. PubMed ID: 16011778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microscopic evaluation of three endodontic files pre- and postinstrumentation.
    Bonetti Filho I; Miranda Esberard R; de Toledo Leonardo R; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1998 Jul; 24(7):461-4. PubMed ID: 9693570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Wear resistance of cryogenically treated stainless steel files.
    Bramipour D; Svec TA; White KW; Powers JM
    J Endod; 2001 Mar; 27(3):212-3. PubMed ID: 11487155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of cutting efficiency of ultrasonic tips used in orthograde endodontic treatment.
    Lin YH; Mickel AK; Jones JJ; Montagnese TA; González AF
    J Endod; 2006 Apr; 32(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 16554212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Study of the progressive changes in canal shape after using different instruments by hand in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Ding-ming H; Hong-xia L; Cheung GS; Lan Z; Hong T; Xue-dong Z
    J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):986-9. PubMed ID: 17878089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals.
    Park H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):715-8. PubMed ID: 11402288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison between a hand stainless-steel K file and a rotary NiTi 0.04 taper.
    Namazikhah MS; Mokhlis HR; Alasmakh K
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 28(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 11324127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An objective evaluation comparing the physical properties of two brands of stainless steel endodontic hand files.
    Dearing GJ; Kazemi RB; Stevens RH
    J Endod; 2005 Nov; 31(11):827-30. PubMed ID: 16249729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hardness and strength of endodontic files and reamers.
    Brockhurst PJ; Denholm I
    J Endod; 1996 Feb; 22(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 8935020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
    Schirrmeister JF; Strohl C; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 16731405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.