241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7595900)
1. Mega-trials: methodological issues and clinical implications.
Charlton BG
J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1995; 29(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 7595900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mega-trials and management of acute myocardial infarction.
Woods KL
Lancet; 1995 Sep; 346(8975):611-4. PubMed ID: 7651008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the validity of clinical trials.
Akobeng AK
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Sep; 47(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18728521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A framework for the design, conduct and interpretation of randomised controlled trials in the presence of treatment changes.
Dodd S; White IR; Williamson P
Trials; 2017 Oct; 18(1):498. PubMed ID: 29070048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The importance of preservation of the ethical principle of equipoise in the design of clinical trials: relative impact of the methodological quality domains on the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials.
Djulbegovic B; Cantor A; Clarke M
Account Res; 2003; 10(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 14989285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials.
Altman DG; Doré CJ
Lancet; 1990 Jan; 335(8682):149-53. PubMed ID: 1967441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS: EVOLVING CHANGES ACCORDING TO PERSONALIZED MEDICINE].
Ernest P; Jandrain B; Scheen AJ
Rev Med Liege; 2015; 70(5-6):232-6. PubMed ID: 26285444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials.
Kunz R; Vist G; Oxman AD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):MR000012. PubMed ID: 17443633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Roaming through the methodology. XX. Randomization as a means of avoiding confounding through indication].
Zielhuis GA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Aug; 144(32):1528-31. PubMed ID: 10949635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice.
Schulz KF; Grimes DA
Lancet; 2002 Feb; 359(9305):515-9. PubMed ID: 11853818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Considerations for the design and analysis of experimental studies in physical activity and exercise promotion: advantages of the randomised controlled trial.
Tai SS; Iliffe S
Br J Sports Med; 2000 Jun; 34(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 10854027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mega-trials vs. meta-analysis: precision vs. heterogeneity?
Shrier I; Platt RW; Steele RJ
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 May; 28(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 17188025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A theoretical analysis showed that blinding cannot eliminate potential for bias associated with beliefs about allocation in randomized clinical trials.
Mathieu E; Herbert RD; McGeechan K; Herbert JJ; Barratt AL
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):667-71. PubMed ID: 24767518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unequal group sizes in randomised trials: guarding against guessing.
Schulz KF; Grimes DA
Lancet; 2002 Mar; 359(9310):966-70. PubMed ID: 11918933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 2: Randomized controlled trials.
Manchikanti L; Hirsch JA; Smith HS
Pain Physician; 2008; 11(6):717-73. PubMed ID: 19057624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The use of randomisation in clinical studies in rehabilitation medicine: basics and practical aspects].
Muche R; Rohlmann F; Büchele G; Gaus W
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2002 Oct; 41(5):311-9. PubMed ID: 12375212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized clinical trials in medical rehabilitation research.
Tate DG; Findley T; Dijkers M; Nobunaga AI; Karunas RB
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1999; 78(5):486-99. PubMed ID: 10493460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological issues of randomized controlled trials for the evaluation of reproductive health interventions.
Villar J; Carroli G
Prev Med; 1996; 25(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 8781015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-inferiority study design: lessons to be learned from cardiovascular trials.
Head SJ; Kaul S; Bogers AJ; Kappetein AP
Eur Heart J; 2012 Jun; 33(11):1318-24. PubMed ID: 22564354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Basics of designing a clinical trial: part I.
Whitney JD
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2000 Sep; 27(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10999963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
