These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7595900)

  • 21. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.
    Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR
    Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 19283747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is Propensity Score Analysis a Valid Surrogate of Randomization for the Avoidance of Allocation Bias?
    Torres F; Ríos J; Saez-Peñataro J; Pontes C
    Semin Liver Dis; 2017 Aug; 37(3):275-286. PubMed ID: 28847037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Are current standards of reporting quality for clinical trials sufficient in addressing important sources of bias?
    Mills EJ; Ayers D; Chou R; Thorlund K
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):2-7. PubMed ID: 26232560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Methodology and application of clinical trials in radiology: self-assessment module.
    Black WC; Krupinski EA; Relyea-Chew A; Chew FS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Mar; 190(3 Suppl):S23-8. PubMed ID: 18321845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering.
    Schulz KF; Grimes DA
    Lancet; 2002 Feb; 359(9306):614-8. PubMed ID: 11867132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Large-scale randomised trials--a misguided approach to clinical research.
    Penston J
    Med Hypotheses; 2005; 64(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 15617882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. General design issues in efficacy, equivalency and superiority trials.
    Fleiss JL
    J Periodontal Res; 1992 Jul; 27(4 Pt 2):306-13; discussion 323-7. PubMed ID: 1507018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Explanations for improvement in both experimental and control groups.
    Becker H; Roberts G; Voelmeck W
    West J Nurs Res; 2003 Oct; 25(6):746-55. PubMed ID: 14528620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Minimum number of clusters and comparison of analysis methods for cross sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcomes: A simulation study.
    Barker D; D'Este C; Campbell MJ; McElduff P
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):119. PubMed ID: 28279222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Randomization in clinical trials in orthodontics: its significance in research design and methods to achieve it.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 21320892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Randomization as a basis for inference in noninferiority trials.
    Wiens BL
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 17128425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conducting clinical trials to establish drug efficacy in chronic pain.
    Harden RN; Bruehl S
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Jul; 80(7):547-57. PubMed ID: 11421526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimation of treatment effect adjusting for treatment changes using the intensity score method: application to a large primary prevention study for coronary events (MEGA study).
    Tanaka Y; Matsuyama Y; Ohashi Y;
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1718-33. PubMed ID: 17922525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Methodological issues in randomized trials assessing probiotics for periodontal treatment.
    Dhingra K
    J Periodontal Res; 2012 Feb; 47(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 21777405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Statistical issues in interpreting clinical trials.
    DeMets DL
    J Intern Med; 2004 May; 255(5):529-37. PubMed ID: 15078496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A note on randomization and selection bias in maintenance therapy clinical trials.
    Greenhouse JB; Meyer MM
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1991; 27(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 1775592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research.
    Newell DJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 1992 Oct; 21(5):837-41. PubMed ID: 1468842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Trends in worldwide volume and methodological quality of surgical randomized controlled trials.
    Ahmed Ali U; van der Sluis PC; Issa Y; Habaga IA; Gooszen HG; Flum DR; Algra A; Besselink MG
    Ann Surg; 2013 Aug; 258(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 23774315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Association between bibliometric parameters, reporting and methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in vascular and endovascular surgery.
    Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Antoniou GA; Green PA; Maden M; Torella F
    Vascular; 2017 Apr; 25(2):196-207. PubMed ID: 27252347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimising the design of phase II oncology trials: the importance of randomisation.
    Ratain MJ; Sargent DJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 19059773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.