These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7596604)
1. Approval process for implants in otolaryngology. Sauberman HR Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Apr; 28(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 7596604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The development of implants and implantable materials. DeMane CQ Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Apr; 28(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 7596603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Brain-Computer Interface devices: risks and Canadian regulations. Alpert S Account Res; 2008; 15(2):63-86. PubMed ID: 18593098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and effectiveness considerations for clinical studies of visual prosthetic devices. Cohen ED J Neural Eng; 2007 Mar; 4(1):S124-9. PubMed ID: 17325410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The FDA's role in medical device clinical studies of human subjects. Saviola J J Neural Eng; 2005 Mar; 2(1):S1-4. PubMed ID: 15876645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tracking and surveillance of patients with medical devices and implants. Morgan RW Med Device Technol; 1993; 4(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 10171686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implantable medical devices and products liability. Posner K Med Trial Tech Q; 1982; 28(3):255-78. PubMed ID: 6927801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast implants, Hippocrates, and burden of proof. McGivney WT Physician Exec; 1992; 18(2):54-5. PubMed ID: 10171041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk analysis: a standard approach? (Part I). Donawa ME Med Device Technol; 1995 Apr; 6(3):11-4. PubMed ID: 10172443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New and improved. Ostrum RF Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Dec; 36(12 Suppl 2):1. PubMed ID: 18264555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Objectivity in the evaluation of biological safety of medical devices and biomaterials. Williams D Med Device Technol; 1991; 2(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10171151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Standardization, control and approval of surgical implants in Europe]. Reigstad A Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Nov; 113(28):3475-7. PubMed ID: 8273079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast implants and the FDA: past, present and future. Stombler RE Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 Jun; 78(6):11-5. PubMed ID: 10171451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiac resynchronization devices: the Food and Drug Administration's regulatory considerations. Moynahan M; Faris OP; Lewis BM J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Dec; 46(12):2325-8. PubMed ID: 16360066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Research subject privacy protection in otolaryngology. Noone MC; Walters KC; Gillespie MB Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Mar; 130(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 15023831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gastroenterology-urology devices; effective date of requirement for premarket approval of the penile inflatable implant. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Final rule. Fed Regist; 2000 Apr; 65(71):19650-8. PubMed ID: 11010632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Liability concerns about implanted material may hurt device availability. Scott L Mod Healthc; 1993 Jun; 23(26):90. PubMed ID: 10171460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Part II: Sealing holes in the safety net. Peterson ED; Hirshfeld JW; Ferguson TB; Kramer JM; Califf RM; Kessler LG Am Heart J; 2004 Jun; 147(6):985-90. PubMed ID: 15199344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Of specialty interest: the Food and Drug Administration: a partner in safe practice. Baker K ORL Head Neck Nurs; 2003; 21(2):25-7. PubMed ID: 12747041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]