These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7597132)

  • 1. Risk factors for caesarean section in Italy: results of a multicentre study.
    Signorelli C; Cattaruzza MS; Osborn JF
    Public Health; 1995 May; 109(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 7597132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A descriptive analysis of the indications for caesarean section in mainland China.
    Liu Y; Li G; Chen Y; Wang X; Ruan Y; Zou L; Zhang W
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Dec; 14():410. PubMed ID: 25495550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trend in primary caesarean delivery: a five-year experience in ABRUZZO, ITALY.
    Di Giovanni P; Garzarella T; Di Martino G; Schioppa FS; Romano F; Staniscia T
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jul; 18(1):514. PubMed ID: 29970095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Caesarean scar pregnancy: time to explore indications of the caesarean sections?
    Begam MA; Mirghani H; Al Omari W; Khair H; Elbiss H; Naeem T; Salahudeen SM
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Apr; 39(3):365-371. PubMed ID: 30634873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical and non-medical reasons for cesarean section delivery in Egypt: a hospital-based retrospective study.
    Elnakib S; Abdel-Tawab N; Orbay D; Hassanein N
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Nov; 19(1):411. PubMed ID: 31703638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determinants of caesarean section rates in Italy.
    Parazzini F; Pirotta N; La Vecchia C; Fedele L
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Mar; 99(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 1606117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unexplained variation in hospital caesarean section rates.
    Lee YY; Roberts CL; Patterson JA; Simpson JM; Nicholl MC; Morris JM; Ford JB
    Med J Aust; 2013 Sep; 199(5):348-53. PubMed ID: 23992192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of primary cesarean section rates: need, validity and parsimony.
    Fantini MP; Stivanello E; Frammartino B; Barone AP; Fusco D; Dallolio L; Cacciari P; Perucci CA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Aug; 6():100. PubMed ID: 16911770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cesarean section in twin pregnancies in two Danish counties with different cesarean section rates.
    Henriksen TB; Sperling L; Hedegaard M; Ulrichsen H; Ovlisen B; Secher NJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Feb; 73(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 8116350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Risk factors analysis for elective caesarean section in Campania region (Italy)].
    Giani U; Bruzzese D; Pugliese A; Saporito M; Triassi M
    Epidemiol Prev; 2011; 35(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 21628753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk factors for the increasing caesarean section rate in Southeast Brazil: a comparison of two birth cohorts, 1978-1979 and 1994.
    Gomes UA; Silva AA; Bettiol H; Barbieri MA
    Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Aug; 28(4):687-94. PubMed ID: 10480697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trend of caesarean section in Italy: an examination of national data 1980-1985.
    Signorelli C; Elliott P; Cattaruzza MS; Osborn J
    Int J Epidemiol; 1991 Sep; 20(3):712-6. PubMed ID: 1955256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determinants of caesarean section in Lebanon: geographical differences.
    Carayol M; Zein A; Ghosn N; Du Mazaubrun C; Breart G
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 22(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 18298687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Caesarean section rates in subgroups of women and perinatal outcomes.
    Zhang J; Geerts C; Hukkelhoven C; Offerhaus P; Zwart J; de Jonge A
    BJOG; 2016 Apr; 123(5):754-61. PubMed ID: 26216434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study.
    Macfarlane AJ; Blondel B; Mohangoo AD; Cuttini M; Nijhuis J; Novak Z; Ólafsdóttir HS; Zeitlin J;
    BJOG; 2016 Mar; 123(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 25753683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why we do caesars: a comparison of the trends in caesarean section delivery over a decade.
    Wang CP; Tan WC; Kanagalingam D; Tan HK
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2013 Aug; 42(8):408-12. PubMed ID: 24045377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities- analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India.
    Singh P; Hashmi G; Swain PK
    BMC Public Health; 2018 May; 18(1):613. PubMed ID: 29747609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study.
    Nippita TA; Lee YY; Patterson JA; Ford JB; Morris JM; Nicholl MC; Roberts CL
    BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):702-11. PubMed ID: 25605625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Upcoming strategies in obstetrics: how the technology of clinical audit may reduce cesarean birth.
    Paracchini S; Masturzo B; Tangolo D; Roletti E; Piazzese A; Attini R; Rolfo A; Todros T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):548-554. PubMed ID: 29082725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk factors and between-hospital variation of caesarean section in Denmark: a cohort study.
    Wehberg S; Guldberg R; Gradel KO; Kesmodel US; Munk L; Andersson CB; Jølving LR; Nielsen J; Nørgård BM
    BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e019120. PubMed ID: 29440158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.