BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7597226)

  • 1. [The role of CT and MR in assessing the patient operated on for rectal carcinoma: the local recurrence of the disease].
    Colagrande S; Tonarelli A; Bartolozzi A; Giannardi G
    Radiol Med; 1995 Apr; 89(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 7597226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Role of CT and RM in postoperative evaluation of the patient after rectal carcinoma surgery: postoperative anatomy and nonneoplastic sequelae].
    Colagrande S; Tonarelli A; Bartolozzi A; Giannardi G
    Radiol Med; 1995 Mar; 89(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 7754117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recurrent rectal cancer: diagnosis with MR imaging versus CT.
    Krestin GP; Steinbrich W; Friedmann G
    Radiology; 1988 Aug; 168(2):307-11. PubMed ID: 3393651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [MR in rectal cancer recurrences].
    Gualdi GF; Caterino M; Polettini E; Ceroni L
    Radiol Med; 1990 May; 79(5):479-82. PubMed ID: 2359854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected rectal cancer: determining tumor localization, stage, and sphincter-saving resectability at 3-Tesla-sustained high resolution.
    Winter L; Bruhn H; Langrehr J; Neuhaus P; Felix R; Hänninen LE
    Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 17453515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of recurrent rectal neoplasms: comparison of reliability and errors of both methods].
    Golfieri R; Totaro C; Giampalma E; Lalli A; Sbrozzi F; Soro A; Nogara G; Gavelli G
    Radiol Med; 1996 May; 91(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 8693127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Computed tomography and magnetic resonance in the preoperative staging of the spread of rectal cancer. A correlation with the anatomicopathological aspects].
    Cova M; Frezza F; Pozzi-Mucelli RS; Ukmar M; Tarjan Z; Melato M; Bucconi S; Dalla Palma L
    Radiol Med; 1994; 87(1-2):82-9. PubMed ID: 8128038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Diagnosis of recurrent rectal cancer: Comparison of CT and MR].
    Krestin GP; Steinbrich W; Friedmann G
    Rofo; 1988 Jan; 148(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 2829302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [MRT and dynamic CT in the diagnosis of a recurrence of rectal carcinoma].
    Bachmann G; Pfeifer T; Bauer T
    Rofo; 1994 Sep; 161(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 7919246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MRI differentiation of recurrent colorectal carcinoma from postoperative fibrosis.
    Gomberg JS; Friedman AC; Radecki PD; Grumbach K; Caroline DF
    Gastrointest Radiol; 1986; 11(4):361-3. PubMed ID: 3770347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MR imaging, CT and CEA scintigraphy in the diagnosis of local recurrence of rectal carcinoma.
    Blomqvist L; Holm T; Göranson H; Jacobsson H; Ohlsén H; Larsson SA
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Sep; 37(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 8915293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Local recurrence of rectal cancer: MR imaging before and after oral superparamagnetic particles vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
    Blomqvist L; Ohlsén H; Hindmarsh T; Jonsson E; Holm T
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(9):1383-9. PubMed ID: 10997424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A comparative evaluation of methods for diagnosing recurrence of rectal cancer after radical surgery].
    Odariuk TS; Sevost'ianov SI; Mit'kov VV; Orlova LP
    Vopr Onkol; 1989; 35(9):1097-103. PubMed ID: 2479175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CT vs MRI in diagnosis of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma.
    Pema PJ; Bennett WF; Bova JG; Warman P
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 8126277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rectal carcinoma treated by preoperative irradiation: MR imaging and histopathologic correlation.
    de Lange EE; Fechner RE; Spaulding CA; Edge SB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 1729783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rectal carcinoma: high-spatial-resolution MR imaging and T2 quantification in rectal cancer specimens.
    Stollfuss JC; Becker K; Sendler A; Seidl S; Settles M; Auer F; Beer A; Rummeny EJ; Woertler K
    Radiology; 2006 Oct; 241(1):132-41. PubMed ID: 16928975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.
    Meyenberger C; Huch Böni RA; Bertschinger P; Zala GF; Klotz HP; Krestin GP
    Endoscopy; 1995 Sep; 27(7):469-79. PubMed ID: 8565885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiological findings do not support lateral residual tumour as a major cause of local recurrence of rectal cancer.
    Syk E; Torkzad MR; Blomqvist L; Ljungqvist O; Glimelius B
    Br J Surg; 2006 Jan; 93(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 16372254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI with dynamic evaluation in diagnosing the local recurrence of rectal cancer.
    Torricelli P; Pecchi A; Luppi G; Romagnoli R
    Abdom Imaging; 2003; 28(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 12483379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mucinous versus nonmucinous rectal carcinomas: differentiation with MR imaging.
    Hussain SM; Outwater EK; Siegelman ES
    Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 10540644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.