These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7597633)

  • 1. Panoramic and tomographic dimensional determinations for maxillary osseointegrated implants. Comparison of the morphologic information potential of two and three dimensional radiographic systems.
    Bolin A; Eliasson S
    Swed Dent J; 1995; 19(1-2):65-71. PubMed ID: 7597633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preimplant radiographic assessment of available maxillary bone support. Comparison of tomographic and panoramic technique.
    Fredholm U; Bolin A; Andersson L
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 8356535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular posterior implant sites: correlation between panoramic and tomographic determinations.
    Bolin A; Eliasson S; von Beetzen M; Jansson L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Dec; 7(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 9151602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of the possibility to treat the edentulous maxilla with osseointegrated implants.
    Petersson A; Lindh C; Carlsson LE
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 1579883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linear tomography in conjunction with pantomography in the assessment of dental implant recipient sites.
    Silverstein LH; Melkonian RW; Kurtzman D; Garnick JJ; Lefkove MD
    J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 7869413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
    Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imaging of dental implants in severely resorbed maxillae using detailed narrow-beam radiography. A methodological study.
    Svenson B; Palmqvist S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 9446975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between subsinus bone height and bone volume requirements for dental implants: a human radiographic study.
    Kopecka D; Simunek A; Brazda T; Rota M; Slezak R; Capek L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 22299078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A tomographic technique for the depiction of atrophied alveolar ridges prior to endosseous implant placement.
    Weingart D; Düker J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 8508941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones in panoramic radiographs of dentate and edentulous subjects.
    Sağlam AA
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 12073724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The reliability of surgeons to avoid traumatic insertion of dental implants into high-risk regions: a panoramic radiograph study.
    Jamil FA; Mohammed JA; Hasan TA; Rzoqi MG
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):96. PubMed ID: 32252728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Radiodiagnostic evaluation in osseointegrated dental implants].
    Andreoli GL; Di Maggio A; Sanna C
    Stomatol Mediterr; 1991; 11(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 1925767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevalence, location, and size of maxillary sinus septa: panoramic radiograph versus computed tomography scan.
    Maestre-Ferrín L; Carrillo-García C; Galán-Gil S; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 69(2):507-11. PubMed ID: 21238847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
    Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon's Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System.
    Garg AK
    Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jun; 18(6):41-5. PubMed ID: 17682685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A comparison of two methods for pre-operative radiographic examination in treatment with oral implants in the anterior mandibular area].
    Sewerin I; Skov SJ
    Tandlaegebladet; 1992 May; 96(8):331-5. PubMed ID: 1412048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging for predictable maxillary implants.
    Duckmanton NA; Austin BW; Lechner SK; Klineberg IJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 8179788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiographic techniques.
    Floyd P; Palmer P; Palmer R
    Br Dent J; 1999 Oct; 187(7):359-65. PubMed ID: 10581812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maxillary sinus floor in edentulous and dentate patients.
    Ohba T; Langlais RP; Morimoto Y; Tanaka T; Hashimoto K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2001; 12(3):121-5. PubMed ID: 11808062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.