These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7598110)

  • 1. The effects of Frankel's function regulator (FR-4) therapy on the treatment of Angle Class I skeletal anterior open bite malocclusion.
    Erbay E; Uğur T; Ulgen M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jul; 108(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 7598110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of the Fränkel's function regulator on the Class III malocclusion.
    Ulgen M; Firatli S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jun; 105(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 8198080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the effects of passive posterior bite-blocks with different construction bites on the craniofacial and dentoalveolar structures.
    Iscan HN; Sarisoy L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 9267229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skeletal and dental effects during observation and treatment with a magnetic device.
    Meral O; Yüksel S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 14719738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary retrognathism cases treated with FR-3 appliance.
    Biren S; Erverdi N
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1993 Sep; 1(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 9582640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skeletal effects in Angle Class II/1 patients treated with the functional regulator type II : Cephalometric and tensor analysis.
    Schulz S; Koos B; Duske K; Stahl F
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Nov; 77(6):420-431. PubMed ID: 27752709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mandibular skeletal changes induced by early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion: a superimposition study.
    Tollaro I; Baccetti T; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Nov; 108(5):525-32. PubMed ID: 7484972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sagittal and vertical effects of rapid maxillary expansion in Class I, II, and III occlusions.
    Farronato G; Giannini L; Galbiati G; Maspero C
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Mar; 81(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 21208083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early treatment of vertical skeletal dysplasia: the hyperdivergent phenotype.
    Sankey WL; Buschang PH; English J; Owen AH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 10982934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Treatment using the Lehman apparatus in patients with malocclusion in light of teleradiologic tests and dental arch measurements].
    Bielawska H
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002; 48():195-212. PubMed ID: 14601478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of vertical chincap therapy on the mandibular morphology in open-bite patients.
    Işcan HN; Dinçer M; Gültan A; Meral O; Taner-Sarisoy L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 12439479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel.
    Freeman DC; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Fränkel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):570.e1-6; discussion 570-1. PubMed ID: 19409337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Rodrigues de Almeida M; Castanha Henriques JF; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Ursi W
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 12401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One year treatment effects of the eruption guidance appliance in 7- to 8-year-old children: a randomized clinical trial.
    Myrlund R; Dubland M; Keski-Nisula K; Kerosuo H
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 25005108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective study of the treatment effects of a removable appliance with palatal crib combined with high-pull chincup therapy in anterior open-bite patients.
    Pedrin F; Almeida MR; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Torres F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 16527639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.