These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7598401)

  • 1. The Basingstoke Orthopaedic Database: a high quality accurate information system for audit.
    Barlow IW; Flynn NA; Britton JM
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 Nov; 76(6 Suppl):285-7. PubMed ID: 7598401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of an aide-memoire to improve the quality of operation notes in an orthopaedic unit.
    Din R; Jena D; Muddu BN
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2001 Sep; 83(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 11806555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of data in the Manchester orthopaedic database.
    Barrie JL; Marsh DR
    BMJ; 1992 Jan; 304(6820):159-62. PubMed ID: 1737162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The quality of operation notes: can simple word processors help?
    O'Bichere A; Sellu D
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1997 Sep; 79(5 Suppl):204-8; discussion 209. PubMed ID: 9496162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Completeness and accuracy of morbidity and repeat prescribing records held on general practice computers in Scotland.
    Whitelaw FG; Nevin SL; Milne RM; Taylor RJ; Taylor MW; Watt AH
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Mar; 46(404):181-6. PubMed ID: 8731627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Documentation in orthopaedic surgery - do integrated care pathways work?
    Crawford JR; Shanahan M
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 May; 85(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 12831495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preparing a clinical activities database in plastic surgery using existing information systems.
    Dunn K; Bazire N; Housley L; Shakespeare P
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 Nov; 76(6 Suppl):282-5. PubMed ID: 7598400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of the oncology patients information system in a regional cancer centre.
    Yau JC; Chan A; Eapen T; Oirourke K; Eapen L
    Oncol Rep; 2002; 9(1):167-9. PubMed ID: 11748476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Who actually does orthopaedic operating?
    Sutherland AG; Brooksbank A; Parwez T; Finlayson DF
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1999 Apr; 44(2):91-3. PubMed ID: 10230202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of clinical case note entries: how good are we at achieving set standards?
    Osborn GD; Pike H; Smith M; Winter R; Vaughan-Williams E
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):458-60. PubMed ID: 16263018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Markers of data quality in computer audit: the Manchester Orthopaedic Database.
    Ricketts D; Newey M; Patterson M; Hitchin D; Fowler S
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1993 Nov; 75(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 8285541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inadequacies of hospital medical records.
    Patel AG; Mould T; Webb PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1993 Jan; 75(1 Suppl):7-9. PubMed ID: 8422161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate?
    Herbert MA; Prince SL; Williams JL; Magee MJ; Mack MJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 77(6):1960-4; discussion 1964-5. PubMed ID: 15172246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of a microcomputer for inpatient audit in an orthopaedic department.
    Broughton NS; Bunker TD; Ackroyd CE
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Jul; 67(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 4037643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of a centrally maintained computerized hospital database: comparison with operating room logbooks.
    Pilpel D; Fraser GM; Kosecoff J; Brook RH
    Isr J Med Sci; 1993 May; 29(5):287-91. PubMed ID: 8314689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limitations of electronic databases: a caution.
    Svenson JE; Pollack SH; Fallat ME; Drapeau JL
    J Ky Med Assoc; 2003 Mar; 101(3):109-12. PubMed ID: 12674902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel management database in obstetrics and gynaecology to introduce the electronic healthcare record and improve the clinical audit process.
    El-Hayes K; Harrity C; Abu Zeineh T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 121():266-75. PubMed ID: 17095825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design and implementation of an audit trail in compliance with US regulations.
    Jiang K; Cao X
    Clin Trials; 2011 Oct; 8(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 21900341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An audit of the quality of operation notes in two district general hospitals. Are we following Royal College guidelines?
    Baigrie RJ; Dowling BL; Birch D; Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 Jan; 76(1 Suppl):8-10. PubMed ID: 8017801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Setting the records straight--a prospective audit of the quality of case notes in a surgical department.
    Chamisa I; Zulu BM
    S Afr J Surg; 2007 Aug; 45(3):92, 94-5. PubMed ID: 17892187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.