These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7598778)

  • 1. Managing sacral pressure ulcers with hydrocolloid dressings: results of a controlled, clinical study.
    Day A; Dombranski S; Farkas C; Foster C; Godin J; Moody M; Morrison M; Tamer C
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Mar; 41(2):52-4, 56, 58 passim. PubMed ID: 7598778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
    Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.
    Seeley J; Jensen JL; Hutcherson J
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
    Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
    Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing clinical efficacy of a hydrocolloid/alginate dressing on full-thickness pressure ulcers.
    Barr JE; Day AL; Weaver VA; Taler GM
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Apr; 41(3):28-30, 32, 34-6 passim. PubMed ID: 7546113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
    Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP
    Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simplifying modern wound management for nonprofessional caregivers.
    Seaman S; Herbster S; Muglia J; Murray M; Rick C
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Aug; 46(8):18-27. PubMed ID: 11189544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Full-thickness pressure ulcers: patient and wound healing characteristics.
    van Rijswijk L
    Decubitus; 1993 Jan; 6(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 8427640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preliminary use of a hydrogel containing enzymes in the treatment of stage II and stage III pressure ulcers.
    Parnell LK; Ciufi B; Gokoo CF
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Aug; 51(8):50-60. PubMed ID: 16234576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a new synthetic polymer sheet wound dressing.
    Motta G; Dunham L; Dye T; Mentz J; O'Connell-Gifford E; Smith E
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Oct; 45(10):41, 44-6, 48-49. PubMed ID: 10687651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses.
    Alm A; Hornmark AM; Fall PA; Linder L; Bergstrand B; Ehrnebo M; Madsen SM; Setterberg G
    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1989; 149():1-10. PubMed ID: 2694713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Xakellis GC; Chrischilles EA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing a foam composite to a hydrocellular foam dressing in the management of venous leg ulcers: a controlled clinical study.
    Vanscheidt W; Sibbald RG; Eager CA
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2004 Nov; 50(11):42-55. PubMed ID: 15545697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biofilm hydrogel dressing: a clinical evaluation in the treatment of pressure sores.
    Darkovich SL; Brown-Etris M; Spencer M
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1990; 29():47-60. PubMed ID: 2202317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective randomized controlled study of Hydrofiber dressing containing ionic silver or calcium alginate dressings in non-ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers.
    Jude EB; Apelqvist J; Spraul M; Martini J;
    Diabet Med; 2007 Mar; 24(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 17305788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
    Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of the effectiveness and cost of treatment with humid environment as compared to traditional cure. Clinical trial on primary care patients with venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers].
    Capillas Pérez R; Cabré Aguilar V; Gil Colomé AM; Gaitano García A; Torra i Bou JE
    Rev Enferm; 2000 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 10788945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
    Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Management of chronic wounds with an innovative absorbent wound dressing.
    Meaume S; Perez J; Rethore V; Sebbane G; Dompmartin A; Bressieux JM; Leguyadec T; Tacca O; Bohbot S
    J Wound Care; 2012 Jul; 21(7):315-6, 318, 320-2. PubMed ID: 22886330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of wound dressings on full-thickness wounds in micropigs.
    Gokoo C; Burhop K
    Decubitus; 1993 Sep; 6(5):42-3, 46, 48 passim. PubMed ID: 8286020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.