These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7598902)

  • 61. Identification of the skeletal remains of a murder victim by DNA analysis.
    Hagelberg E; Gray IC; Jeffreys AJ
    Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6334):427-9. PubMed ID: 1861721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Sex identification by analysis of DNA extracted from hard tissues].
    Honda K; Harihara S; Nakamura T; Hirai M; Misawa S
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1990 Aug; 44(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 2266607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Difficulties of sex determination from forensic bone degraded DNA: A comparison of three methods.
    Quincey D; Carle G; Alunni V; Quatrehomme G
    Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 23937932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Further validation of a quadruplex STR DNA typing system: a collaborative effort to identify victims of a mass disaster.
    Clayton TM; Whitaker JP; Fisher DL; Lee DA; Holland MM; Weedn VW; Maguire CN; DiZinno JA; Kimpton CP; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int; 1995 Nov; 76(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 8591832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The validation of short tandem repeat (STR) loci for use in forensic casework.
    Lygo JE; Johnson PE; Holdaway DJ; Woodroffe S; Whitaker JP; Clayton TM; Kimpton CP; Gill P
    Int J Legal Med; 1994; 107(2):77-89. PubMed ID: 7819123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Megaplex DNA typing can provide a strong indication of the authenticity of ancient DNA amplifications by clearly recognizing any possible type of modern contamination.
    Hummel S; Bramanti B; Schultes T; Kahle M; Haffner S; Herrmann B
    Anthropol Anz; 2000 Mar; 58(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 10816781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Development of internal amplification controls for DNA profiling with the AmpFℓSTR(®) SGM Plus(®) kit.
    Zahra N; Hadi S; Smith JA; Iyengar A; Goodwin W
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Jun; 32(11):1371-8. PubMed ID: 21590757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Further validation of a multiplex STR system for use in routine forensic identity testing.
    Andersen JF; Greenhalgh MJ; Butler HR; Kilpatrick SR; Piercy RC; Way KA; Myhill HS; Wright JC; Hallet R; Parkin BH
    Forensic Sci Int; 1996 Mar; 78(1):47-64. PubMed ID: 8855046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Multiplex amplification of STR loci with gender alleles using infrared fluorescence detection.
    Steffens DL; Roy R; Brumbaugh JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 1997 Mar; 85(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 9149407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. DNA analysis in human bone and other specimens of forensic interest: PCR typing and testing.
    Lee HC; Ruano G; Pagliaro EM; Berka KM; Gaensslen RE
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1991; 31(2):213-6. PubMed ID: 1940835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. PCR-amplification and detection of the human D1S80 VNTR locus. Amplification conditions, population genetics and application in forensic analysis.
    Kloosterman AD; Budowle B; Daselaar P
    Int J Legal Med; 1993; 105(5):257-64. PubMed ID: 8471543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. High sensitive DNA typing approaches for the analysis of forensic evidence: comparison of nested variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) amplification and a short tandem repeats (STR) polymorphism.
    Schmitt C; Schmutzler A; Prinz M; Staak M
    Forensic Sci Int; 1994 Jun; 66(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 8063275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Identification of bodies from the scene of a mass disaster using DNA amplification of short tandem repeat (STR) loci.
    Clayton TM; Whitaker JP; Maguire CN
    Forensic Sci Int; 1995 Nov; 76(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 8591839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Forensic applications of a rapid, sensitive, and precise multiplex off lysis of the four short tandem repeat loci HUMVWF31/A, HUMTH01, HUMF13A1, and HUMFES/FPS.
    Robertson JM; Sgueglia JB; Badger CA; Juston AC; Ballantyne J
    Electrophoresis; 1995 Sep; 16(9):1568-76. PubMed ID: 8582337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Validation of the STR system FXIIIB for forensic purposes in an Austrian population sample.
    Klintschar M; Crevenna R
    Forensic Sci Int; 1996 Jul; 81(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 8784992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Forensic evaluation of HUMCD4: an Italian database.
    Casarino L; Mannucci A; Kimpton CP; Presciuttini S; Bruni G; Costa MG; De Stefano F
    Int J Legal Med; 1996; 109(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 8876325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The contribution of DNA to the disaster victim identification (DVI) effort.
    Hartman D; Drummer O; Eckhoff C; Scheffer JW; Stringer P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Feb; 205(1-3):52-8. PubMed ID: 21106312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Basic issues in forensic DNA typing.
    Schneider PM
    Forensic Sci Int; 1997 Jul; 88(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9251228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Multiplexing of Y chromosome specific STRs and performance for mixed samples.
    Prinz M; Boll K; Baum H; Shaler B
    Forensic Sci Int; 1997 Mar; 85(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 9149405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Estimation of DNA concentration in forensic samples prior to multiplex PCR amplification.
    Butler JM
    Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2011 Feb; 2011(2):pdb.prot5560. PubMed ID: 21285260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.