These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7599366)

  • 1. Using science to influence the Supreme Court on the right to refuse treatment: amicus curiae briefs in Washington v. Harper.
    Schwartz HI; Boland R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 7599366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. APA's amicus curiae program: Bringing psychological research to judicial decisions.
    Gilfoyle N; Dvoskin JA
    Am Psychol; 2017 Nov; 72(8):753-763. PubMed ID: 29172578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. At law. One flew over the Supreme Court.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 1973926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supreme Court rules mentally ill prison inmates may be involuntarily medicated.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1990 May; 41(5):572. PubMed ID: 11642773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asserting scientific authority. Cognitive development and adolescent legal rights.
    Gardner W; Scherer D; Tester M
    Am Psychol; 1989 Jun; 44(6):895-902. PubMed ID: 2751154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decoding right to refuse treatment law.
    Perlin ML
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1993; 16(1-2):151-77. PubMed ID: 8099069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
    Parry JW
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a descriptive study of the New York experience with judicial review.
    Ladds B; Convit A; Zito J; Vitrai J
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):529-45. PubMed ID: 7914440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Washington v. Harper: prisoners' rights to refuse antipsychotic medication.
    Appelbaum PS
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1990 Jul; 41(7):731-2. PubMed ID: 1973135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary treatment case or catalyst for change?
    Leong GB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):292-4. PubMed ID: 16186189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The fight over Roe v. Wade: the Webster briefs.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(3):134-6. PubMed ID: 2759219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. After Cruzan. The U. S. Supreme Court's decision settles the case but raises new questions.
    Johnson SH
    Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):38-41, 57. PubMed ID: 10107437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Washington v. Harper.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Feb; 110():1028-56. PubMed ID: 12041281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
    Dlugacz HA
    Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CHA amicus curiae brief on physician-assisted suicide. Catholic Health Association.
    Health Prog; 1997; 78(3):35-43, 47. PubMed ID: 10184725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The United States Supreme Court and psychiatry in the 1990s.
    Ciccone JR
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 22(1):197-211. PubMed ID: 10083955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Denouement of an execution competency case: is Perry pyrrhic?
    Mossman D
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(2):269-84. PubMed ID: 8605411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
    Cort RS
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
    Knepper K
    Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Substantive due process limits on the duration of civil commitment for the treatment of mental illness.
    Burgett DW
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1981; 16(1):205-64. PubMed ID: 11650560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.