These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7599366)

  • 21. Forced medication of defendants to achieve trial competency: an update on the law after Sell.
    Hilgers K; Ramer P
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 2004; 17(4):813-26. PubMed ID: 15685765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
    Brooks AD
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Correction to "Empirical support for the United States Supreme Court's protection of the psychotherapist-patient privilege".
    Marsh JE
    Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(2):197-9. PubMed ID: 15835047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The impact of judicial review of patients' refusal to accept antipsychotic medications at the Minnesota Security Hospital.
    Farnsworth MG
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 1674892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
    Quinlan M
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 2004 Feb; 84(1):275-99. PubMed ID: 16211756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Jones v. Gerhardstein: the involuntarily committed mental patient's right to refuse treatment with psychotropic drugs.
    Ledwith DM
    Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(5):1367-98. PubMed ID: 16047454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Brophy v New England Sinai Hospital, Inc. Brief amicus curiae, Society for the Right to Die, Inc. on behalf of appellant.
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1987 Jul; 35(7):669-78. PubMed ID: 3584770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Errors by the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, and the National Educational, Association in representing homosexuality in amicus briefs about Amendment 2 to the U.S. Supreme Court.
    Cameron P; Cameron K; Landess T
    Psychol Rep; 1996 Oct; 79(2):383-404. PubMed ID: 8909060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Consequences of involuntary treatment.
    Hassenfeld IN
    Am J Psychiatry; 1998 Mar; 155(3):450-1. PubMed ID: 9501768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The right to "just say no": a history and analysis of the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
    Cichon DE
    LA Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 53(2):283-426. PubMed ID: 11657118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellants.
    Blaustein AP
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):204-33. PubMed ID: 11644397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The right to refuse antipsychotic medication: who decides?
    Zajc M
    Med Law; 1987; 6(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 2883550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Supreme court of Canada's "Beautiful Mind" case.
    Gray JE; O'Reilly RL
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 19643478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Guaranteeing the right to treatment.
    Hoffman PB; Dunn RC
    Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):7-11+. PubMed ID: 11662297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Children's rights after the supreme court's decision on Parham v. J.L. and J.R.
    Frank CC
    Child Welfare; 1980 Jun; 59(6):375-80. PubMed ID: 7379613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Right of a defendant to refuse antipsychotic medication during a criminal trial.
    Williams KG
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Sep; 50(4):1937-9. PubMed ID: 11660177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.