179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 760167)
1. Absorbed radiation dose in mammography.
Hammerstein GR; Miller DW; White DR; Masterson ME; Woodard HQ; Laughlin JS
Radiology; 1979 Feb; 130(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 760167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation dose in mammography: an energy-balance approach.
Shrivastava PN
Radiology; 1981 Aug; 140(2):483-90. PubMed ID: 7255726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography.
Wu X; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 2006265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Thermoluminescent dosimeters for in vivo measurement of radiation exposure and related dose in mammography.
Omran HA
Radiol Technol; 1982; 53(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 6927768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Thermoluminescent dosimetry for radiation exposure of the breast during film and xeromammography (author's transl)].
Säbel M; Ruff A; Weishaar J
Rofo; 1978 May; 128(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 149076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of absorbed dose in mammography: monte carlo simulation studies.
Doi K; Chan HP
Radiology; 1980 Apr; 135(1):199-208. PubMed ID: 7360961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Radiation exposure in x-ray mammography].
Säbel M; Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R
Rofo; 2001 Feb; 173(2):79-91. PubMed ID: 11253092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography.
Wu X; Gingold EL; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 8090926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The resulting skin dose in two-view mammography examinations.
Adliene D; Cibulskaite I; Laurikaitiene J; Adlys G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):298-302. PubMed ID: 20200100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [New aspects in evaluation of the average-absorbed dose of the parenchyma in mammography (author's transl)].
Schneider G; Kindl P; Spreizer H
Rofo; 1978 Jan; 128(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 146669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A study of mammographic exposure and detail visibility using three systems: Xerox 125, Min-R, and Xonics XERG.
Stanton L; Villafana T; Day JL; Lightfoot DA; Stanton RE
Radiology; 1979 Aug; 132(2):455-62. PubMed ID: 461808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
Friedrich MA
Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Somatic radiation risk to the breast under different radiological research procedures].
John V; Ewen K
Strahlenther Onkol; 1986 Jan; 162(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 3945919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient dose and risk in mammography.
Law J
Br J Radiol; 1991 Apr; 64(760):360-5. PubMed ID: 2025777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of radiation doses in mammography].
Lee SK; Hwang SK; Lee LN; Lou GC; Wang CA; Hsu WJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1993 Mar; 51(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 8490794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scatter dose from tangential breast irradiation to the uninvolved breast.
Muller-Runkel R; Kalokhe UP
Radiology; 1990 Jun; 175(3):873-6. PubMed ID: 2343139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Normalized average glandular dose in magnification mammography.
Liu B; Goodsitt M; Chan HP
Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 7568836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of ion chamber and TLD dosimetry in mammography.
Stanton L; Day JL; Brattelli SD; Lightfoot DA; Vince MA; Stanton RE
Med Phys; 1981; 8(6):792-8. PubMed ID: 7322077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
