BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 760167)

  • 21. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography].
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 11142129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Breast dosimetry.
    Dance DR; Skinner CL; Carlsson GA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):185-203. PubMed ID: 10028637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Normalized pediatric organ-absorbed doses from CT examinations.
    Fearon T; Vucich J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Jan; 148(1):171-4. PubMed ID: 3491508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Uroradiographic dosimetry using a rare-earth screen-film system.
    Segal AJ; Maillie HD; Lemkin JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Nov; 139(5):923-6. PubMed ID: 6981976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast dose during electron-beam CT: measurement with film dosimetry.
    McCollough CH; Liu HH
    Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):153-7. PubMed ID: 7784559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of breast composition on absorbed dose and image contrast.
    Skubic SE; Fatouros PP
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(4):544-52. PubMed ID: 2770628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography.
    Gingold EL; Wu X; Barnes GT
    Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):639-44. PubMed ID: 7753987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Entrance skin exposure and mean glandular dose: effect of scatter and field gradient at mammography.
    Ng KH; Aus RJ; DeWerd LA; Vetter JR
    Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 9356619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Absorbed breast dose: dependence on radiographic modality and technique, and breast thickness.
    Skubic SE; Fatouros PP
    Radiology; 1986 Oct; 161(1):263-70. PubMed ID: 3763877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Investigation of thyroid dose due to mammography.
    Whelan C; McLean D; Poulos A
    Australas Radiol; 1999 Aug; 43(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 10901923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Absorbed dose in xeromammography.
    Zárand P; Péntek Z
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Feb; 53(626):114-9. PubMed ID: 7370491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mammographic practice and dosimetry in Britain.
    Fitzgerald M; White DR; White E; Young J
    Br J Radiol; 1981 Mar; 54(639):212-20. PubMed ID: 7470783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Determination of the integral doses in conventional x-ray studies and computed tomography of the skull].
    Plattfaut G; Ewen K
    Rofo; 1987 Apr; 146(4):455-9. PubMed ID: 3033772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of skin dose for breast chest wall radiotherapy as a function of bolus material.
    Hsu SH; Roberson PL; Chen Y; Marsh RB; Pierce LJ; Moran JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(10):2593-606. PubMed ID: 18441412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quality assurance breast phantoms for screen-film mammography: design and use.
    Stanton L; Villafana T
    Appl Radiol; 1989 Nov; 18(11):41-8. PubMed ID: 10304413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dosage evaluation in mammography.
    Stanton L; Villafana T; Day JL; Lightfoot DA
    Radiology; 1984 Feb; 150(2):577-84. PubMed ID: 6691119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Absorbed doses to critical organs from full mouth dental radiography].
    Zhang G; Yasuhiko O; Hidegiko Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 34(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11776538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Patient radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization.
    Nikolic B; Spies JB; Lundsten MJ; Abbara S
    Radiology; 2000 Jan; 214(1):121-5. PubMed ID: 10644110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Doses in mammography: from the phantom to the patient.
    Cross P
    Australas Radiol; 1994 Feb; 38(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 8147794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.