147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 760176)
1. Large-scale time-sharing X-ray generators. Statistical considerations related to ensuring reliability using redundant components.
Gelfand DW; How JR
Radiology; 1979 Feb; 130(2):535-6. PubMed ID: 760176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [A system of work safety standards. X-ray diagnostic offices. Safety requirements (OST 42-21-15--83)].
Kochetova GP; Chikirdin EG
Med Tekh; 1984; (3):40-1. PubMed ID: 6748901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Part two: Implementing a shared quality assurance program.
Lindstrom R
Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Mar; 56(3):32-4. PubMed ID: 421982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Work safety for the x-ray laboratory assistant].
Kochetova GP
Med Sestra; 1985 Jan; 44(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 3848619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of government regulation on radiology.
Rossi RP
Radiol Manage; 1980; 2(2):22-30. PubMed ID: 10245600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The technologist and the patient building a more caring relationship.
Cunningham JJ
Adm Radiol; 1988 Jul; 7(7):53-6. PubMed ID: 10288809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. R. T. or not R. T.? that is the question.
Lindstrom R
Dimens Health Serv; 1981 Jul; 58(7):22. PubMed ID: 7286468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reject film study. Cost and quality considerations in a radiology department.
Glaser SM; Dehn TG
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Jun; 6(6):19-22. PubMed ID: 6773009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A course on computed tomography for radiologic technologists: a conceptual framework.
Seeram E
Can J Radiogr Radiother Nucl Med; 1983; 14(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 10258524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The impersonalization of radiological technology.
Moss J
Can J Med Radiat Technol; 1988 May; 19(2):55-65. PubMed ID: 10288106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance evaluation of radiologic technologists: a method for improving the communicative process.
Kettlehake JE; Malott JC
Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 10288781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiology services on a tight budget.
MacEwan DW
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1980 Jun; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7380875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Designing a shared radiology quality assurance program.
Lindstrom R
Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Jan; 56(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 761723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The radiographer's role in increasing the efficiency of the diagnostic imaging department.
Racoveanu NT
Radiography; 1984; 50(592):151-8. PubMed ID: 6463221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Capital planning in radiology.
Thrall JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Nov; 159(5):1107-11. PubMed ID: 1414785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Outfitting radiodiagnostic offices and the problems of radiation safety].
Panfilova NP; Sokolova LD
Med Sestra; 1988 Jan; 47(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 3357407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of an image quality assurance program.
Göthlin JH; Alders B
Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):228-30. PubMed ID: 4029161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Quality and safety are more important than price when buying radiologic equipment].
Tidebrant G; Lukes P; Wihed A
Lakartidningen; 1992 Feb; 89(8):550-1. PubMed ID: 1740947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost sensitivity analysis for radiology department planning.
Sullivan WG; Thuesen GJ
Health Serv Res; 1971; 6(4):337-49. PubMed ID: 5133836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost effectiveness: radiologic services.
Lucas SJ
Ohio State Med J; 1979 May; 75(5):290-3. PubMed ID: 111190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
