These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7601802)

  • 1. Use of component analyses to identify active variables in treatment packages for children with feeding disorders.
    Cooper LJ; Wacker DP; McComas JJ; Brown K; Peck SM; Richman D; Drew J; Frischmeyer P; Millard T
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(2):139-53. PubMed ID: 7601802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of texture fading in the treatment of food selectivity.
    Shore BA; Babbitt RL; Williams KE; Coe DA; Snyder A
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):621-33. PubMed ID: 9891398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of extinction and reinforcement to increase food consumption and reduce expulsion.
    Coe DA; Babbitt RL; Williams KE; Hajimihalis C; Snyder AM; Ballard C; Efron LA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):581-3. PubMed ID: 9316264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using descriptive assessment in the treatment of bite acceptance and food refusal.
    Casey SD; Perrin CJ; Lesser AD; Perrin SH; Casey CL; Reed GK
    Behav Modif; 2009 Sep; 33(5):537-58. PubMed ID: 19675310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brief hierarchical assessment of potential treatment components with children in an outpatient clinic.
    Harding J; Wacker DP; Cooper LJ; Millard T; Jensen-Kovalan P
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 8063627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noncontingent and differential reinforcement in the treatment of pediatric feeding problems.
    Berth DP; Bachmeyer MH; Kirkwood CA; Mauzy CR; Retzlaff BJ; Gibson AL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Jul; 52(3):622-641. PubMed ID: 30972752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the "control over reinforcement" component in functional communication training.
    Kahng S; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG; Worsdell AS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(2):267-76; quiz 277. PubMed ID: 9210306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combining stimulus fading, reinforcement, and extinction to treat food refusal.
    Freeman KA; Piazza CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):691-4. PubMed ID: 9891407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the relative contributions of noncontingent reinforcement and escape extinction in the treatment of food refusal.
    Reed GK; Piazza CC; Patel MR; Layer SA; Bachmeyer MH; Bethke SD; Gutshall KA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 15154213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A brief component analysis of potential treatment packages in an outpatient clinic setting with young children.
    Millard T; Wacker DP; Cooper LJ; Harding J; Drew J; Plagmann LA; Asmus J; McComas J; Jensen-Kovalan P
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(4):475-6. PubMed ID: 8307834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parental assessment and treatment of food selectivity in natural settings.
    Najdowski AC; Wallace MD; Doney JK; Ghezzi PM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):383-6. PubMed ID: 14596582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Kahng SW; Iwata BA; Thompson RH; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):419-32. PubMed ID: 11214020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of two differential reinforcement procedures with escape extinction to treat food refusal.
    Patel MR; Piazza CC; Martinez CJ; Volkert VM; Christine MS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(4):363-74. PubMed ID: 12555908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extinction of self-injurious escape behavior with and without instructional fading.
    Zarcone JR; Iwata BA; Vollmer TR; Jagtiani S; Smith RG; Mazaleski JL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(3):353-60. PubMed ID: 8407683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Descriptive analyses of pediatric food refusal: the structure of parental attention.
    Woods JN; Borrero JC; Laud RB; Borrero CS
    Behav Modif; 2010 Jan; 34(1):35-56. PubMed ID: 20051524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the relative contributions of positive reinforcement and escape extinction in the treatment of food refusal.
    Piazza CC; Patel MR; Gulotta CS; Sevin BM; Layer SA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):309-24. PubMed ID: 14596572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of a structured descriptive assessment methodology to identify variables affecting problem behavior.
    Anderson CM; Long ES
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):137-54. PubMed ID: 12102134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contingency contacting. Combining positive reinforcement and escape extinction procedures to treat persistent food refusal.
    Hoch T; Babbitt RL; Coe DA; Krell DM; Hackbert L
    Behav Modif; 1994 Jan; 18(1):106-28. PubMed ID: 8037643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of sleep disruption on the treatment of a feeding disorder.
    Reed GK; Dolezal DN; Cooper-Brown LJ; Wacker DP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(2):243-5. PubMed ID: 16033171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of dense-to-lean and fixed lean schedules of alternative reinforcement and extinction.
    Hagopian LP; Toole LM; Long ES; Bowman LG; Lieving GA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15529889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.