These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 760273)

  • 21. [Image quality in film and xero mammography. Second paper. Reproduction of medium range contrast (author's transl)].
    Willgeroth F; Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J
    Rofo; 1980 Apr; 132(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 6450105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Diagnostic significance of high-filtration xeromammography in relation to radiation hazard and image quality (author's transl)].
    John V; Ewen K
    Rontgenblatter; 1978 Jun; 31(6):326-8. PubMed ID: 675061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Interest of a combination of film and screen reinforcer in mammography (author's transl)].
    Berry M; Clément JF; Daniel G
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1978 Jan; 59(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 641872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A comparison of the radiation dose from film and xeroradiography (author's transl)].
    Evers R; Römer M
    Rofo; 1975 Jul; 123(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 130303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography.
    Klausz R; Shramchenko N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):369-74. PubMed ID: 15933139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The procedures and results of a quality control program in mammography carried out on a regional basis].
    Milano F; Rosselli Del Turco M; Maggi E; Certo N; Morrone D; Lazzeri B
    Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 8628928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [New aspects in evaluation of the average-absorbed dose of the parenchyma in mammography (author's transl)].
    Schneider G; Kindl P; Spreizer H
    Rofo; 1978 Jan; 128(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 146669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reduction of absorbed dose in radiography of the breast. Experience with a new screen-film combination.
    Andersson I; Andrén L; Nilsson M; Pettersson C
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1977 Mar; 18(2):264-8. PubMed ID: 860660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [New intensifying screens in clinical radiology III: Screen-film combinations in mammography (author's transl)].
    Hagemann G; Knedel H; Weberling R
    Rofo; 1978 Aug; 129(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 151029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The technical support of mammography].
    Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Riudiger IuG; Kochetova GP; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE
    Med Tekh; 2000; (5):45-7. PubMed ID: 11076366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Image quality in film and xero-mammography. I. Rendering of low contrast values (author's transl)].
    Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
    Rofo; 1977 Jun; 126(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 142714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Phantom experiments and early clinical experience with a mammogram apparatus using a grid (author's transl)].
    Schreer I; Demelt M; Würthner K
    Rofo; 1978 Sep; 129(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 151055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The XERG-mammography system: a solution to the dose-quality problem?
    Friedrich M
    Eur J Radiol; 1981 May; 1(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 7338239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Lell M; Kuchar I; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New and future developments in screen-film mammography equipment and techniques.
    Kimme-Smith C
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 1732935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The use of the Daylight System in mammography].
    Giuseppetti G; Maggi S; Ercolani P; Procaccini G; Amici F
    Radiol Med; 1989; 78(1-2):107-11. PubMed ID: 2781054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparative study of films and screens for mammography.
    Kirkpatrick AE; Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Jan; 60(709):73-8. PubMed ID: 3814998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.