101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 760379)
41. Action potentials in the cat at low sound intensities: thresholds, latencies, and rates of change.
Price GR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Nov; 64(5):1400-5. PubMed ID: 744840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Genetic nature of the dissociation between the cochlear microphonic potential and the action potential of the auditory nerve of the audiogenic mouse].
Niaussat MM
C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1968 Jul; 162(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 4236014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Nonsurgical recording of human auditory nerve action potentials and cochlear microphonics.
Coats AC; Dickey JR
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1970 Aug; 79(4):844-52. PubMed ID: 5526995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Effects of extracochlear direct current stimulation on the ensemble auditory nerve activity of cats.
Schreiner CE; Snyder RL; Johnstone BM
Hear Res; 1986; 21(3):213-26. PubMed ID: 3013822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The role of the organ of Corti in auditory nerve stimulation.
Lawrence M; Johnsson LG
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1973; 82(4):464-72. PubMed ID: 4721184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Rate responses of auditory nerve fibers to tones in noise near masked threshold.
Young ED; Barta PE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):426-42. PubMed ID: 3950195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Development of cochlear potentials in rats.
Uziel A; Romand R; Marot M
Audiology; 1981; 20(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 7224981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Neural correlates of psychophysical release from masking.
Mott JB; McDonald LP; Sinex DG
J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Dec; 88(6):2682-91. PubMed ID: 2283440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Changes of the intensity function of the response of the auditory nerve (N 1) by masking sounds].
Legouix JP; Remond MC; Delvoye M
C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1970; 164(5):988-91. PubMed ID: 4250675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Efferent olivocochlear bundle: some relationships to noise masking and to stimulus attenuation.
Dewson JH
J Neurophysiol; 1967 Jul; 30(4):817-32. PubMed ID: 6035692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Normal critical bands in the cat.
Pickles JO
Acta Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(3-4):245-54. PubMed ID: 1180038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. II. Detection of tones in noise.
Colburn HS
J Acoust Soc Am; 1977 Feb; 61(2):525-33. PubMed ID: 845314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Elevation of auditory thresholds by spontaneous cochlear oscillations.
Powers NL; Salvi RJ; Wang J; Spongr V; Qiu CX
Nature; 1995 Jun; 375(6532):585-7. PubMed ID: 7791874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Nonlinear phenomena as observed in the ear canal and at the auditory nerve.
Fahey PF; Allen JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):599-612. PubMed ID: 3973231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Efferent inhibition of auditory-nerve responses: dependence on acoustic-stimulus parameters.
Wiederhold ML; Peake WT
J Acoust Soc Am; 1966 Dec; 40(6):1427-30. PubMed ID: 5975579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. [On the physiology of the centrifugal hearing system: lack of mutual interaction between the cochleae, measured by the click-elicited sum action potential N1 and N2 in electric supramaxillary stimulation of the contralateral acoustic nerve].
Pfalz R
Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1965; 185(2):575-7. PubMed ID: 5881086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Psychophysical frequency resolution in the cat as determined by simultaneous masking and its relation to auditory-nerve resolution.
Pickles JO
J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Dec; 66(6):1725-32. PubMed ID: 521557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Measurement of the combination tone 2f1-f2 using two-tone forward masking and compound action potential responses.
Norris CH; Johnstone BM
Hear Res; 1984 Sep; 15(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 6501115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A physiological ear model for the emulation of masking.
Baumgarte F
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(5):294-304. PubMed ID: 10529651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Difference of auditory brainstem responses by stimulating to round and oval window in animal experiments.
Lee JH; Park HS; Wei Q; Kim MN; Cho JH
Bioengineered; 2017 Jan; 8(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 27689303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
