These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 760381)

  • 1. Behavioral auditory function after transection of crossed olivo-cochlear bundle in the cat. IV. Study on pure-tone frequency discrimination.
    Igarashi M; Cranford JL; Nakai Y; Alford BR
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(1-2):79-83. PubMed ID: 760381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Behavioral auditory function after transection of crossed olivo-cochlear bundle in the cat. III. Further study of ambient light intensity discrimination under intense noise.
    Igarashi M; Cranford JL; Nakai Y; Alford BR
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1977; 83(5-6):410-6. PubMed ID: 888676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavioral auditory function after transection of crossed olivo-cochlear bundle in the cat. V. Pure-tone intensity discrimination.
    Igarashi M; Cranford JL; Allen EA; Alford BR
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(5-6):429-33. PubMed ID: 463513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behavioral auditory function after transection of crossed olivo-cochlear bundle in the cat. I. Pure-tone threshold and perceptual signal-to-noise ratio.
    Igarashi M; Alford BR; Nakai Y; Gordon WP
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1972 Jun; 73(6):455-66. PubMed ID: 5047110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
    Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sectioning the efferent bundle decreases cochlear frequency selectivity.
    Carlier E; Pujol R
    Neurosci Lett; 1982 Jan; 28(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 7063139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Olivo-cochlear inhibition during physostigmine-induced activity in the pontine reticular formation in the decerebrate cat.
    Kingsley RE; Barnes CD
    Exp Neurol; 1973 Jul; 40(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 4351633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulation studies in the descending auditory pathway.
    Glenn JF; Oatman LC
    Brain Res; 1980 Aug; 196(1):258-61. PubMed ID: 7397525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. I. Dependence on electrical stimulation parameters.
    Rajan R
    J Neurophysiol; 1988 Aug; 60(2):549-68. PubMed ID: 3171641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioral auditory function after transection of crossed olivo-cochlear bundle in the cat. II. Conditioned visual performance with intense white noise.
    Igarashi M; Alford BR; Gordon WP; Nakai Y
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1974 May; 77(5):311-7. PubMed ID: 4835630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
    Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Symmetrical lateralization of function in the auditory system of the cat: effects of unilateral ablation of cortex.
    Casseday JH; Diamond IT
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1977 Sep; 299():255-63. PubMed ID: 280206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of crossed olivo-cochlear bundle stimulation on acoustic trauma.
    Takeyama M; Kusakari J; Nishikawa N; Wada T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 1604980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ionic mechanism of the efferent olivo-cochlear inhibition studied by cochlear perfusion in the cat.
    Desmedt JE; Robertson D
    J Physiol; 1975 May; 247(2):407-28. PubMed ID: 1097639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of cochlear amplification, frequency tuning, and two-tone suppression in the mouse.
    Song L; McGee J; Walsh EJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 99(1):344-55. PubMed ID: 17989242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency extent of two-tone facilitation in onset units in the ventral cochlear nucleus.
    Jiang D; Palmer AR; Winter IM
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jan; 75(1):380-95. PubMed ID: 8822565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of bilateral olivocochlear lesions on vowel formant discrimination in cats.
    Hienz RD; Stiles P; May BJ
    Hear Res; 1998 Feb; 116(1-2):10-20. PubMed ID: 9508024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Delgutte B; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid changes in the frequency tuning of neurons in cat auditory cortex resulting from pure-tone-induced temporary threshold shift.
    Calford MB; Rajan R; Irvine DR
    Neuroscience; 1993 Aug; 55(4):953-64. PubMed ID: 8232905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On- and off-frequency compression estimated using a new version of the additivity of forward masking technique.
    Plack CJ; Arifianto D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):771-86. PubMed ID: 20707447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.