BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 760381)

  • 1. Behavioral auditory function after transection of crossed olivo-cochlear bundle in the cat. IV. Study on pure-tone frequency discrimination.
    Igarashi M; Cranford JL; Nakai Y; Alford BR
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(1-2):79-83. PubMed ID: 760381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Behavioral auditory function after transection of crossed olivo-cochlear bundle in the cat. III. Further study of ambient light intensity discrimination under intense noise.
    Igarashi M; Cranford JL; Nakai Y; Alford BR
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1977; 83(5-6):410-6. PubMed ID: 888676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavioral auditory function after transection of crossed olivo-cochlear bundle in the cat. V. Pure-tone intensity discrimination.
    Igarashi M; Cranford JL; Allen EA; Alford BR
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(5-6):429-33. PubMed ID: 463513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behavioral auditory function after transection of crossed olivo-cochlear bundle in the cat. I. Pure-tone threshold and perceptual signal-to-noise ratio.
    Igarashi M; Alford BR; Nakai Y; Gordon WP
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1972 Jun; 73(6):455-66. PubMed ID: 5047110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
    Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sectioning the efferent bundle decreases cochlear frequency selectivity.
    Carlier E; Pujol R
    Neurosci Lett; 1982 Jan; 28(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 7063139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Olivo-cochlear inhibition during physostigmine-induced activity in the pontine reticular formation in the decerebrate cat.
    Kingsley RE; Barnes CD
    Exp Neurol; 1973 Jul; 40(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 4351633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulation studies in the descending auditory pathway.
    Glenn JF; Oatman LC
    Brain Res; 1980 Aug; 196(1):258-61. PubMed ID: 7397525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. I. Dependence on electrical stimulation parameters.
    Rajan R
    J Neurophysiol; 1988 Aug; 60(2):549-68. PubMed ID: 3171641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioral auditory function after transection of crossed olivo-cochlear bundle in the cat. II. Conditioned visual performance with intense white noise.
    Igarashi M; Alford BR; Gordon WP; Nakai Y
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1974 May; 77(5):311-7. PubMed ID: 4835630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
    Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Symmetrical lateralization of function in the auditory system of the cat: effects of unilateral ablation of cortex.
    Casseday JH; Diamond IT
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1977 Sep; 299():255-63. PubMed ID: 280206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of crossed olivo-cochlear bundle stimulation on acoustic trauma.
    Takeyama M; Kusakari J; Nishikawa N; Wada T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 1604980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ionic mechanism of the efferent olivo-cochlear inhibition studied by cochlear perfusion in the cat.
    Desmedt JE; Robertson D
    J Physiol; 1975 May; 247(2):407-28. PubMed ID: 1097639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of cochlear amplification, frequency tuning, and two-tone suppression in the mouse.
    Song L; McGee J; Walsh EJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 99(1):344-55. PubMed ID: 17989242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency extent of two-tone facilitation in onset units in the ventral cochlear nucleus.
    Jiang D; Palmer AR; Winter IM
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jan; 75(1):380-95. PubMed ID: 8822565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of bilateral olivocochlear lesions on vowel formant discrimination in cats.
    Hienz RD; Stiles P; May BJ
    Hear Res; 1998 Feb; 116(1-2):10-20. PubMed ID: 9508024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Delgutte B; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid changes in the frequency tuning of neurons in cat auditory cortex resulting from pure-tone-induced temporary threshold shift.
    Calford MB; Rajan R; Irvine DR
    Neuroscience; 1993 Aug; 55(4):953-64. PubMed ID: 8232905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On- and off-frequency compression estimated using a new version of the additivity of forward masking technique.
    Plack CJ; Arifianto D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):771-86. PubMed ID: 20707447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.