These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7605189)

  • 1. The chi-square test: its use in rehabilitation research.
    Ottenbacher KJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1995 Jul; 76(7):678-81. PubMed ID: 7605189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biostatistics Series Module 4: Comparing Groups - Categorical Variables.
    Hazra A; Gogtay N
    Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 27512183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Canonical correlation and chi-square: relationships and interpretation.
    Dunlap WP; Brody CJ; Greer T
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Oct; 127(4):341-53. PubMed ID: 11109997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table.
    Kangave D
    West Afr J Med; 1992; 11(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 1476961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of tests of contingency tables.
    Amiri S; Modarres R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(5):784-796. PubMed ID: 27936354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A revisit to contingency table and tests of independence: bootstrap is preferred to Chi-square approximations as well as Fisher's exact test.
    Lin JJ; Chang CH; Pal N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):438-58. PubMed ID: 24905809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximally selected chi-square statistics for ordinal variables.
    Boulesteix AL
    Biom J; 2006 Jun; 48(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 16845908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variable criteria sequential stopping rule: Validity and power with repeated measures ANOVA, multiple correlation, MANOVA and relation to Chi-square distribution.
    Fitts DA
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1988-2003. PubMed ID: 28936614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chi-Squared Test of Fit and Sample Size-A Comparison between a Random Sample Approach and a Chi-Square Value Adjustment Method.
    Bergh D
    J Appl Meas; 2015; 16(2):204-17. PubMed ID: 26075668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistics for clinicians. 2. Nominal data (I).
    Nanivadekar AS; Kannappan AR
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1990 Dec; 38(12):931-5, 974. PubMed ID: 2096131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chi 2 tests: how useful are they in the analysis of medical research data?
    Osborn JF
    Ann Ig; 1989; 1(3-4):417-32. PubMed ID: 2483622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Categorical independence tests for large sparse r-way contingency tables.
    Mielke PW; Berry KJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Oct; 95(2):606-10. PubMed ID: 12434857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chi-square test for R x C contingency tables with clustered data.
    Jung SH; Kang SH; Ahn C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 May; 13(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 12729392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing for marginal independence between two categorical variables with multiple responses.
    Bilder CR; Loughin TM
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):241-8. PubMed ID: 15032795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change.
    Dimitrov DM; Rumrill PD
    Work; 2003; 20(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 12671209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The analysis of 2 x 1 and 2 x 2 contingency tables: an historical review.
    Richardson JT
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1994; 3(2):107-33. PubMed ID: 7952428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Noncentral Chi-square Distribution in Misspecified Structural Equation Models: Finite Sample Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation.
    Curran PJ; Bollen KA; Paxton P; Kirby J; Chen F
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2002 Jan; 37(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 26824167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Yates's correction for continuity and the analysis of 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Haviland MG
    Stat Med; 1990 Apr; 9(4):363-7; discussion 369-83. PubMed ID: 2362976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Symmetry in square contingency tables: tests of hypotheses and confidence interval construction.
    May WL; Johnson WD
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):23-33. PubMed ID: 11459440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.