BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7605593)

  • 1. Safety/risk assessment of chemicals compared for different expert groups.
    Dourson ML; Lu FC
    Biomed Environ Sci; 1995 Mar; 8(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 7605593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of the Food Quality Protection Act children's health safety factor in the U.S. EPA pesticide risk assessments.
    Naidenko OV
    Environ Health; 2020 Feb; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 32041625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of the World Health Organization in the evaluation of pesticides.
    Herrman JL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1993 Jun; 17(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 8337420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
    Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Basis for a proposed reference dose (RfD) for dioxin of 1-10 pg/kg-day: a weight of evidence evaluation of the human and animal studies.
    Greene JF; Hays S; Paustenbach D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(2):115-59. PubMed ID: 12554432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety assessment based on irrelevant toxicologic data: an extraordinary case of bromomethane used as a fumigant.
    Lu FC; Coulston F
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1996 Feb; 33(1):100-1. PubMed ID: 8744929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
    Kavlock R; Dix D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. VCCEP pilot: progress on evaluating children's risks and data needs.
    Williams PR; Patterson J; Briggs DW
    Risk Anal; 2006 Jun; 26(3):781-801. PubMed ID: 16834634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developmental toxicity risk assessment: consensus building, hypothesis formulation, and focused research.
    Kimmel CA
    Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):85-103. PubMed ID: 8744591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radio frequency radiation exposure standards: considerations for harmonization.
    Erdreich LS; Klauenberg BJ
    Health Phys; 2001 May; 80(5):430-9. PubMed ID: 11316073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective evaluation of the impact of functional immunotoxicity testing on pesticide hazard identification and risk assessment.
    Gehen SC; Blacker AM; Boverhof DR; Hanley TR; Hastings CE; Ladics GS; Lu H; O'Neal FO
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2014 May; 44(5):407-19. PubMed ID: 24601769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.
    Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Bemis JC; Benz RD; Douglas GR; Elespuru RK; Johnson GE; Kirkland DJ; LeBaron MJ; Li AP; Marchetti F; Pottenger LH; Rorije E; Tanir JY; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Yauk CL; Zeiger E; Luijten M
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):264-283. PubMed ID: 27650663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of an additional safety or uncertainty factor for nature of toxicity in the estimation of acceptable daily intake and tolerable daily intake values.
    Renwick AG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Dec; 22(3):250-61. PubMed ID: 8837849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of developmental neurotoxicity data in pesticide risk assessments.
    Raffaele KC; Rowland J; May B; Makris SL; Schumacher K; Scarano LJ
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2010; 32(5):563-72. PubMed ID: 20398750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Part II: Quantitative Evaluation of Choices Used in Setting Noncancer Chronic Human Health Reference Values Across Organizations.
    Holman E; Francis R; Gray G
    Risk Anal; 2017 May; 37(5):879-892. PubMed ID: 27654007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informing 21st-Century Risk Assessments with 21st-Century Science.
    Birnbaum LS; Burke TA; Jones JJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 2016 Apr; 124(4):A60-3. PubMed ID: 27035154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EPA sets new policy on pesticide cancer risks.
    Norman C
    Science; 1988 Oct; 242(4877):366-7. PubMed ID: 3175656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental Protection Agency risk assessment--process and toxicologic pathology.
    Copley MP
    Toxicol Pathol; 1997; 25(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 9061854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Background to the ADI/TDI/PTWI.
    Herrman JL; Younes M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Oct; 30(2 Pt 2):S109-13. PubMed ID: 10597623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Framework for metals risk assessment.
    Fairbrother A; Wenstel R; Sappington K; Wood W
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2007 Oct; 68(2):145-227. PubMed ID: 17889701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.