These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7606614)
1. Position of epicardial patch electrodes for implantable defibrillation significantly affects shock strength requirements. KenKnight BH; Heil JE; Hahn SJ; Lang DJ Acad Emerg Med; 1995 Jan; 2(1):50-5, discussion 55-6. PubMed ID: 7606614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations. Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrode polarity is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy using a nonthoracotomy system. Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May; 17(5 Pt 1):919-23. PubMed ID: 8022704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of single-biphasic versus sequential-biphasic shocks on defibrillation threshold in pigs. Csanadi Z; Jones DL; Wood GK; Klein GJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jun; 20(6):1606-12. PubMed ID: 9227756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defibrillation efficacy of commercially available biphasic impulses in humans. Importance of negative-phase peak voltage. Tomassoni G; Newby K; Deshpande S; Axtell K; Sra J; Akhtar M; Natale A Circulation; 1997 Apr; 95(7):1822-6. PubMed ID: 9107169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A direct comparison of epicardial and nonthoracotomy defibrillation using monophasic and biphasic shocks. Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Chapman PD; Wetherbee JN Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 1):70-4. PubMed ID: 7700834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of implantable cardioverter/defibrillator lead placement in the right ventricle on defibrillation energy requirements. A combined experimental and clinical study. Winter J; Heil JE; Schumann C; Lin Y; Schannwell CM; Michel U; Schipke JD; Schulte HD; Gams E Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Oct; 14(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 9845149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms. Dixon EG; Tang AS; Wolf PD; Meador JT; Fine MJ; Calfee RV; Ideker RE Circulation; 1987 Nov; 76(5):1176-84. PubMed ID: 3665001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of defibrillation probability of success curves for an endocardial lead configuration with and without an inactive epicardial patch. Callihan RL; Idriss SF; Dahl RW; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 May; 25(6):1373-9. PubMed ID: 7722136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and site of initiation on the defibrillation threshold during early ventricular fibrillation. Strobel JS; Kenknight BH; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Aug; 32(2):521-7. PubMed ID: 9708486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transvenous biventricular defibrillation. Meisel E; Butter C; Philippon F; Higgins S; Strickberger SA; Smith J; Hahn S; Michel U; Schubert B; Pfeiffer D Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(9A):76K-85K. PubMed ID: 11084104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vector magnitude using orthogonal ECG leads during ventricular fibrillation is associated with defibrillation outcome. Gurunathan S; Hsia PW; Lawton J; Hua DP Biomed Instrum Technol; 1998; 32(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 9475962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of electrode configuration and capacitor size on internal atrial defibrillation threshold using leads currently used for ventricular defibrillation. Neri R; Palermo P; Cesario AS; Baragli D; Amici E; Laudadio MT; De Rosa A; DeSeta F; Mongeon L; Gambelli G J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 10387142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of epicardial electrode size and implant site for reduced sequential pulse defibrillation thresholds. Kallok MJ; Bourland JD; Tacker WA; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Wessale JL Med Instrum; 1986; 20(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 3959941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway. Thakur R; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 8608460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]