These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7607132)

  • 1. Mouse or molecule? Mechanism-based toxicology in cancer risk assessment.
    Lang L
    Environ Health Perspect; 1995 Apr; 103(4):334-6. PubMed ID: 7607132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Carcinogen assessment jeopardised by new procedures.
    Furlow B
    Lancet Oncol; 2008 Jun; 9(6):518. PubMed ID: 18536121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Toxicological basis for evaluating health risk].
    Rolecki R; Dutkiewicz T; Kończalik J
    Med Pr; 1992; 43(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 1406237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Various suggestions on the unification of methods for experimental substantiation of maximum permissible concentration of chemical carcinogens].
    Litvinov NN; Titova TA
    Gig Sanit; 1977 Oct; (10):69-73. PubMed ID: 598727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproductive Toxicology. Editorial.
    Piersma AH
    Reprod Toxicol; 2010 Aug; 30(1):1. PubMed ID: 20580665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A snapshot on the progress of in vitro toxicology for safety assessment.
    Jennings P; Corvi R; Culot M
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Dec; 45(Pt 3):269-271. PubMed ID: 29195642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cancer risk assessment: importance of identifying mechanisms of action.
    Bull RJ
    J Am Water Works Assoc; 1990 Oct; 82(10):57-60. PubMed ID: 11538297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive toxicology today: the transition from biological knowledge to practicable models.
    Benigni R
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 12(9):989-92. PubMed ID: 27351633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Approaches used by the US National Toxicology Program in assessing the toxicity of chemical mixtures.
    Schwetz BA; Yang RS
    IARC Sci Publ; 1990; (104):113-20. PubMed ID: 2228109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and theEnvironment. Statement on ILSI/HESI research programme on alternative cancer models.
    Blain PG
    Toxicol Pathol; 2003; 31(2):254-7. PubMed ID: 12696588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An approach to the detection of environmental tumour promoters by a short-term cultured-cell assay.
    Moulé Y
    Food Addit Contam; 1984; 1(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 6536531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicals--introduction to this special issue.
    van Ravenzwaay B; Dekant W; Vrijhof H
    Toxicol Lett; 2013 Dec; 223(3):269-70. PubMed ID: 24140152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of novel technologies and mechanistic data for risk assessment under the real-life risk simulation (RLRS) approach.
    Hernández AF; Docea AO; Goumenou M; Sarigiannis D; Aschner M; Tsatsakis A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2020 Mar; 137():111123. PubMed ID: 31926207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Special issue on the toxicology and epidemiology of benzene.
    Faroon O; Wilbur S
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2008; 24(5-6):261-2. PubMed ID: 19022879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro methods in regulatory toxicology: the crucial significance of validation.
    Balls M
    Arch Toxicol Suppl; 1995; 17():155-62. PubMed ID: 7786153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE): An essential element for in vitro-based risk assessment.
    Yoon M; Blaauboer BJ; Clewell HJ
    Toxicology; 2015 Jun; 332():1-3. PubMed ID: 25680635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The long and winding road of progress in the use of in vitro data for risk assessment purposes: From "carnation test" to integrated testing strategies.
    Blaauboer BJ
    Toxicology; 2015 Jun; 332():4-7. PubMed ID: 24769060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Paradigm lost, paradigm found: the re-emergence of hormesis as a fundamental dose response model in the toxicological sciences.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Pollut; 2005 Dec; 138(3):379-411. PubMed ID: 16098930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel strategies for toxicological risk assessments.
    Roy A; Akbarsha MA
    ALTEX; 2014; 31(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 24448760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [In vitro methods and their use in toxicology].
    Hurná E
    Vet Med (Praha); 1997 Jul; 42(7):213-5. PubMed ID: 9304279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.