These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 760724)

  • 1. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences.
    Plomp R; Mimpen AM
    Audiology; 1979; 18(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 760724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability in the determination of speech reception threshold (SRT).
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(4):195-202. PubMed ID: 531473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-retest variability in testing hearing of speech.
    Hughes EC; Arthur RH; Johnson RL
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 511653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.
    Nilsson M; Soli SD; Sullivan JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1085-99. PubMed ID: 8132902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners.
    Duquesnoy AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1136-44. PubMed ID: 6643835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing a speech intelligibility test based on measuring speech reception thresholds in noise for English and Finnish.
    Vainio M; Suni A; Jarveläinen H; Järvikivi J; Mattila VV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1742-50. PubMed ID: 16240832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interlist equivalency of the CID W-22 word lists presented in quiet and in noise.
    Loven FC; Hawkins DB
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 6840418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pediatric speech intelligibility test: performance-intensity characteristics.
    Jerger S; Jerger J
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(6):325-34. PubMed ID: 7152156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use.
    MacLeod A; Summerfield Q
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Feb; 24(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 2317599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation into the applicability and optimization of the Dutch matrix sentence test for use with cochlear implant users.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Nov; 53(11):817-28. PubMed ID: 24975235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of the Farsi Hearing in Noise Test.
    Darouie A; Zamiri Abdollahi F; Joulaie M; Nik Nezhad S; Ahmadi T; Soli S
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Feb; 59(2):148-152. PubMed ID: 31560226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 6719016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thresholds and psychometric functions of the individual spondaic words.
    Young LL; Dudley B; Gunter MB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Dec; 25(4):586-93. PubMed ID: 7162160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An adaptive Australian Sentence Test in Noise (AuSTIN).
    Dawson PW; Hersbach AA; Swanson BA
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 23598772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Characteristics, advantages, and limits of matrix tests].
    Brand T; Wagener KC
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):182-188. PubMed ID: 27538937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise.
    Hagerman B; Kinnefors C
    Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 7761803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Construction and evaluation of the Mandarin Chinese matrix (CMNmatrix) sentence test for the assessment of speech recognition in noise.
    Hu H; Xi X; Wong LLN; Hochmuth S; Warzybok A; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):838-850. PubMed ID: 30178681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.